COVID-19 Economic Response and Recovery: A Rapid Scoping Review.
This rapid scoping review of existing evidence and research gaps addressed the following question: what research evidence exists and what are the research gaps at global, regional, and national levels on interventions to protect jobs, small- and medium-sized enterprises, and formal/informal sector w...
| Publicado en: | International Journal of Health Services Vol. 51; no. 2; pp. 247 - 261 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | research systematic review Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
Apr2021
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=150230045&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 150230045 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00207314 E6D jtl: International Journal of Health Services issn: 00207314 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Apr2021 vid: 51 iid: 2 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. place: Thousand Oaks, California artinfo: ui: 150230045 149349144 150230045 150230045 10.1177/00207314211002785 150230045 ppf: 247 ppct: 14 formats: tig: atl: COVID-19 Economic Response and Recovery: A Rapid Scoping Review. aug: au: Mawani, Farah N. Gunn, Virginia O'Campo, Patricia Anagnostou, Michelle Muntaner, Carles Wanigaratne, Susitha Perri, Melissa Ziegler, Carolyn An, Angie affil: 10071Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada sug: subj: COVID-19 Economics Employment Job Satisfaction Implementation Science Environmental Sustainability Human Scoping Review Systematic Review Literature Review Socioeconomic Factors ab: This rapid scoping review of existing evidence and research gaps addressed the following question: what research evidence exists and what are the research gaps at global, regional, and national levels on interventions to protect jobs, small- and medium-sized enterprises, and formal/informal sector workers in socioeconomic response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic? The results are based on 79 publications deemed eligible for inclusion after the screening and prioritizing of 1,658 records. The findings are organized according to the 3 main categories of socioeconomic interventions—protecting jobs, enterprises, and workers—although the 3 are intertwined. Most results were derived from global-level gray literature with recommendations for interventions and implicit links to the sustainable development goals. Based on research gaps uncovered in the review, future implementation science research needs to focus on designing, implementing, evaluating, and scaling: effective evidence-based socioeconomic interventions; equity-focused, redistributive, and transformative interventions; comprehensive packages of complementary interventions; interventions to upend root causes of systemic social inequities; collaborative and participatory approaches; interventions that integrate environmental sustainability; and city-level interventions. Failing to consider the environmental dimensions of economic recovery is shortsighted and will ultimately exacerbate social inequities and poverty and undermine economic stability in the long term. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research systematic review Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|