Are dominant platforms good for consumers?

We develop a two‐sided market model where both platforms and sellers charge buyers for access. When network effects are moderate, a dominant platform that attracts more sellers and buyers is more likely to arise. Compared to when platforms split the market equally, a dominant platform always leads t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Economic Inquiry Vol. 59; no. 3; pp. 1364 - 1378
Autores principales: Ko, Chiu Yu, Shen, Bo
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jul2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=150539866&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 150539866
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00952583
        EIQ
      jtl: Economic Inquiry
      issn: 00952583
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2021
      vid: 59
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        150539866
        10.1111/ecin.12966
      ppf: 1364
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 860KB
      tig:
        atl: Are dominant platforms good for consumers?
      aug:
        au:
          Ko, Chiu Yu
          Shen, Bo
        affil:
          Department of Decision Science and Managerial Economics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
          Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
      su:
        Consumer goods
        Network effect
        Consumers' surplus
        Consumer complaints
      sug:
        subj:
          Consumer goods
          Network effect
          All Other Consumer Goods Rental
          Consumers' surplus
          Consumer complaints
      keyword:
        dominant platform
        two‐sided markets
        welfare
        dominant platform
        two‐sided markets
        welfare
      ab: We develop a two‐sided market model where both platforms and sellers charge buyers for access. When network effects are moderate, a dominant platform that attracts more sellers and buyers is more likely to arise. Compared to when platforms split the market equally, a dominant platform always leads to higher consumer surplus and total welfare. Moreover, both of these measures improve as network effects increase. Our results suggest that competition authorities should be cautious regarding complaints related to dominant platforms in two‐sided markets, as they may be good for consumers.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N