Evaluating Others If They Stand Up for Their Moral Convictions, and Evaluating Ourselves If We Don't Stand Up.

Acting on one's moral principles is not always easy. Upholding one's moral beliefs may run counter to one's social environment or situational demands. It may often cause people to remain silent on their convictions, while at the same time some may show the moral courage to speak out. How do people e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Social Justice Research Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. 173 - 196
Autores principales: Cramwinckel, Florien M., van den Bos, Kees, van Dijk, Eric
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jun2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=150669286&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 150669286
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08857466
        4LL
      jtl: Social Justice Research
      issn: 08857466
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2021
      vid: 34
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        150669286
        10.1007/s11211-021-00367-y
      ppf: 173
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 792KB
      tig:
        atl: Evaluating Others If They Stand Up for Their Moral Convictions, and Evaluating Ourselves If We Don't Stand Up.
      aug:
        au:
          Cramwinckel, Florien M.
          van den Bos, Kees
          van Dijk, Eric
        affil:
          Social, Health, and Organizational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
          Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science: Youth Studies, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
          Online Dialogue, Sint Jacobsstraat 31, 3511 BL, Utrecht, The Netherlands
          Social, Economic and Organizational Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
      su:
        Moral courage
        Sexual rights
        Equal rights
        Sexual minorities
        Social context
      sug:
        subj:
          Moral courage
          Sexual rights
          Equal rights
          Sexual minorities
          Social context
      keyword:
        Gay rights
        Moral conviction
        Moral refuser
        Gay rights
        Moral conviction
        Moral refuser
      ab: Acting on one's moral principles is not always easy. Upholding one's moral beliefs may run counter to one's social environment or situational demands. It may often cause people to remain silent on their convictions, while at the same time some may show the moral courage to speak out. How do people evaluate those who do stand up, and how does it affect their self-evaluations? In two experimental studies (Ns = 207 and 204), we investigated both types of evaluations. The studies demonstrate that people who failed to uphold their moral beliefs still had positive evaluations of others who showed moral courage. More specifically, pro-gay participants who went along with writing an anti-gay essay denouncing equal rights for sexual minorities had positive evaluations of another person who spoke up and refused this task. The failure to display moral courage had negative consequences for participants' self-concepts. In Experiment 1, we show that pro-gay participants' positive self-concepts were lowered after writing an anti-gay essay (vs. a pro-gay essay). In Experiment 2, we reveal that participants' positive self-concepts were lowered only when they were confronted with morally courageous behavior and their own failure to uphold their moral beliefs was visible to the experimenter.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N