Ambivalencija S. Kierkegaard'o nerimo (Angest) sampratoje.
The paper considers two problems related to the interpretation of S. Kierkegaard's conception of Angest. Firstly, a tendency to interpret Kierkegaard's Angest as a "fear without an object" and to posit its similarity to Heidegger's Angst is put in question. Questioning this interpretation, an analys...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 99; pp. 148 - 161 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=150682997&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 150682997 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2021 vid: 99 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 150682997 10.15388/Problemos.99.11 ppf: 148 ppct: 13 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.1MB tig: atl: Ambivalencija S. Kierkegaard'o nerimo (Angest) sampratoje. aug: au: Grigas, Justinas affil: Vilniaus universiteto, Filosofijos institutas su: Ambivalence Anxiety Attention Lithuanians Translators Individuation (Philosophy) Individuation (Psychology) sug: subj: Ambivalence Anxiety Attention Lithuanians Translators Individuation (Philosophy) Individuation (Psychology) keyword: ambivalence anxiety fear Kierkegaard ambivalencija Angest baimė Kierkegaard'as nerimas ab: The paper considers two problems related to the interpretation of S. Kierkegaard's conception of Angest. Firstly, a tendency to interpret Kierkegaard's Angest as a "fear without an object" and to posit its similarity to Heidegger's Angst is put in question. Questioning this interpretation, an analysis of The Concept of Anxiety is undertaken, in order to reveal ambivalence as the primary feature of Kierkegaard's conception of Angest. Secondly, the question of translating Angest into Lithuanian is addressed, criticizing the established tradition of translating Angest as "baimė" (fear) and supporting translator's I. Tomaševičiūtė's choice of "nerimas". The aforementioned ambivalence of Angest serves as the basis for the critique, revealing Angest as a paradoxical attraction to that, which frightens. The first part of the paper expounds on the moment of ambivalence in the descriptions of Angest, found in The Concept of Anxiety. The second part compares and underlines the differences between the philosophical approaches of Kierkegaard and Heidegger. It is shown that Kierkegaard's attention to the ambivalence of Angest is related to the practical bent of Kierkegaard's philosophy and the problematics of personal individuation. Straipsnyje sprendžiamos dvi su Søreno Kierkegaard'o Angest sampratos interpretacija susijusios problemos. Pirma, kvestionuojama tendencija Kierkegaard'o Angest interpretuoti kaip „baimę be objekto“ ir gretinti ją su Martino Heideggerio Angst samprata. Prieštaraujant šiai interpretacijai, analizuojama Kierkegaard'o knyga Nerimo sąvoka, atskleidžiant ambivalenciją kaip pagrindinį Kierkegaard'o Angest sampratos bruožą. Antra, svarstomas Angest vertimo į lietuvių kalbą klausimas, kritikuojant nusistovėjusią tradiciją Angest versti kaip „baimė“ bei palaikant vertėjos Ievos Tomaševičiūtės siūlomą vertinį „nerimas“. Kritikos pagrindą sudaro ta pati Angest ambivalencija: Angest interpretuojamas kaip paradoksali trauka tam, kas baugina. Pirmoje straipsnio dalyje išskleidžiamas Angest aprašymuose glūdintis ambivalencijos momentas. Antroje dalyje glaustai aptariamos Kierkegaard'o ir Heideggerio filosofinės prieigos per jų santykį su nerimo tema, akcentuojant jų skirtumus. Parodoma, kad Kierkegaard'o dėmesys nerimo ambivalencijai yra susijęs su Kierkegaard'o filosofijos praktine orientacija ir asmens individuacijos problematika. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Lithuanian refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2021 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|