The Timescale of Control: A Meta-Control Property that Generalizes across Tasks but Varies between Types of Control.

Prominent models of control assume that conflict and the probability of conflict are signals used by control processes that regulate attention. For example, when conflict is frequent across preceding trials (i.e., high probability of conflict), control processes bias attention toward goal-relevant i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience Vol. 21; no. 3; pp. 472 - 490
Autores principales: Dey, Abhishek, Bugg, Julie M.
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Jun2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=150935711&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 150935711
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15307026
        NA4
      jtl: Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
      issn: 15307026
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2021
      vid: 21
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        150935711
        148065655
        10.3758/s13415-020-00853-x
        150935711
      ppf: 472
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: The Timescale of Control: A Meta-Control Property that Generalizes across Tasks but Varies between Types of Control.
      aug:
        au:
          Dey, Abhishek
          Bugg, Julie M.
        affil: Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1125, 63130, St. Louis, MO, USA
      sug:
      ab: Prominent models of control assume that conflict and the probability of conflict are signals used by control processes that regulate attention. For example, when conflict is frequent across preceding trials (i.e., high probability of conflict), control processes bias attention toward goal-relevant information on subsequent trials. An important but underspecified question regards the meta-control property of timescale—that is, how far back does the control system "look" to determine the probability of conflict? To address this question, Aben, Verguts, and Van den Bussche (2017) developed a statistical model quantifying the timescale of control. In a flanker task, they observed short timescales for lists with a low probability of conflict (which induce reactive control) and long timescales for lists with a high probability of conflict (which induce proactive control). To investigate the domain generality of these timescales, we applied their model to two additional conflict tasks that manipulated the list-wide probability of conflict. Our findings replicated Aben et al. suggesting meta-control may be task general with respect to timescales operating on the list level. We subsequently modified their model to examine timescale differences for items in the same list that differed in their probability of conflict but not the type of control engaged. We failed to detect a difference in timescales between items. Collectively, the findings demonstrate that differences in the timescale of control are task general and suggest that timescale differences are driven by the type of control engaged and not by the probability of conflict per se.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N