Challenging mental illness stigma in healthcare professionals and students: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Stigma among healthcare professionals may lead to poor quality of healthcare services for patients with mental illness. This study conducts a network meta-analysis to estimate the relative efficacy between different types of anti-stigma interventions for healthcare professionals. Network meta-analys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Psychology & Health Vol. 36; no. 6; pp. 669 - 685
Autores principales: Lien, Yin-Yi, Lin, Hui-Shin, Lien, Yin-Ju, Tsai, Chi-Hsuan, Wu, Ting-Ting, Li, Hua, Tu, Yu-Kang
Formato: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jun2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Stigma among healthcare professionals may lead to poor quality of healthcare services for patients with mental illness. This study conducts a network meta-analysis to estimate the relative efficacy between different types of anti-stigma interventions for healthcare professionals. Network meta-analysis. The attitudes and behavior intension of healthcare professionals toward mental illness. A total of 18 studies (22 trials) from 9 countries are included in the analysis. In the network meta-analysis, rank probabilities show interventions with indirect contact plus lecture (SUCRA = 81.5%), direct contact plus problem-based learning workshop (SUCRA = 77.4%), and indirect contact (SUCRA = 72.2%) having the highest probability of being ranked first, second, and third, respectively. Our findings suggest that education combining social contact is the most effective anti-stigma intervention, which can be implemented in clinical practices to help reduce this stigma and improve healthcare services for patients with mental illness.