Environmental benefits of large‐scale second‐generation bioethanol production in the EU: An integrated supply chain network optimization and life cycle assessment approach.

The use of agricultural residues for the generation of bioethanol has the potential to substitute fuels such as petrol or first‐generation bioethanol and thereby generate environmental benefits. Scientific research in this field typically confines the environmental dimension to global warming, disre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Industrial Ecology Vol. 25; no. 3; pp. 677 - 693
Autores principales: Wietschel, Lars, Messmann, Lukas, Thorenz, Andrea, Tuma, Axel
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jun2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=151004036&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 151004036
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10881980
        FL1
      jtl: Journal of Industrial Ecology
      issn: 10881980
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2021
      vid: 25
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        151004036
        10.1111/jiec.13083
      ppf: 677
      ppct: 16
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Environmental benefits of large‐scale second‐generation bioethanol production in the EU: An integrated supply chain network optimization and life cycle assessment approach.
      aug:
        au:
          Wietschel, Lars
          Messmann, Lukas
          Thorenz, Andrea
          Tuma, Axel
        affil: Resource Lab, Institute of Materials Resource Management, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
      su:
        European Union
        Environmental degradation
        Environmental quality
        Ethanol as fuel
        Tax remission
        Supply chains
        Excise tax
      sug:
        subj:
          Environmental degradation
          European Union
          Environmental quality
          Ethanol as fuel
          Tax remission
          Supply chains
          Excise tax
      keyword:
        bioeconomy
        environmental benefits
        industrial ecology
        multi‐objective optimization
        network planning
        second‐generation bioethanol
        bioeconomy
        environmental benefits
        industrial ecology
        multi‐objective optimization
        network planning
        second‐generation bioethanol
      ab: The use of agricultural residues for the generation of bioethanol has the potential to substitute fuels such as petrol or first‐generation bioethanol and thereby generate environmental benefits. Scientific research in this field typically confines the environmental dimension to global warming, disregarding other environmental impact and damage categories. By multi‐criteria mixed‐integer linear programming, this work examines environmental benefits and economic viability of optimal second‐generation bioethanol production network configurations to substitute petrol and/or first‐generation bioethanol in the EU. The results comprise environmentally optimal decisions for 18 impact and 3 damage categories, as well as economically optimal solutions for different excise and carbon tax scenarios. The impact categories global warming potential, particulate matter, and land use are affected the most. Optimal network decisions for different environmental objectives can be clustered into three groups of mutual congruencies, but opportunity costs between the different groups can be very high, indicating conflicting decisions. The decision to substitute petrol or first‐generation ethanol has the greatest influence. The results of the multi‐dimensional analysis suggest that the damage categories human health and ecosystem quality are suitable to unveil tradeoffs between conflicting environmental impacts, for example, global warming and land use. Taking human health and ecosystem quality as environmental decision criteria, second‐generation bioethanol should be used to concurrently substitute first‐generation bioethanol and petrol (100% and 18% of today's demand in the EU, respectively). However, economic optimization shows that with current taxation, bioethanol is hardly competitive with petrol, and that excise tax abatement or carbon taxes are needed to achieve these volumes. This article met the requirements for a gold‐gold JIE data openness badge described at http://jie.click/badges.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N