Tracking the Costs of Clear and Loud Speech: Interactions Between Speech Motor Control and Concurrent Visuomotor Tracking.

Purpose: Prior work has demonstrated that competing tasks impact habitual speech production. The purpose of this investigation was to quantify the extent to which clear and loud speech are affected by concurrent performance of an attention-demanding task. Method: Speech kinematics and acoustics were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 64; pp. 2182 - 2196
Main Authors: Whitfield, Jason A., Holdosh, Serena R., Kriegel, Zoe, Sullivan, Lauren E., Fullenkamp, Adam M.
Format: Article
Published: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 2021 Supplement
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=151199865&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 151199865
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10924388
        1SM
      jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
      issn: 10924388
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2021 Supplement
      vid: 64
      pid: 42
      pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        151199865
        10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00264
      ppf: 2182
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.1MB
      tig:
        atl: Tracking the Costs of Clear and Loud Speech: Interactions Between Speech Motor Control and Concurrent Visuomotor Tracking.
      aug:
        au:
          Whitfield, Jason A.
          Holdosh, Serena R.
          Kriegel, Zoe
          Sullivan, Lauren E.
          Fullenkamp, Adam M.
        affil:
          Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Bowling Green State University, OH
          School of Human Movement, Sport, & Leisure Studies, Bowling Green State University, OH
      su:
        Ohio
        Oral communication
        Motor ability
        Task performance
        Attention
        Visuomotor coordination
        Human kinematics
        Acoustics
        Lips
        Tasks
        Labiality (Phonetics)
        Physiological aspects of speech
        Range of motion of joints
        Confidence intervals
        Human voice
        Time
        Speech evaluation
        Comparative studies
        Visual perception
        Research funding
        Descriptive statistics
        Statistical models
        Kinematics
      sug:
        subj:
          Oral communication
          Motor ability
          Task performance
          Attention
          Ohio
          Visuomotor coordination
          Human kinematics
          Acoustics
          Lips
          Tasks
          Labiality (Phonetics)
          Physiological aspects of speech
          Range of motion of joints
          Confidence intervals
          Human voice
          Time
          Speech evaluation
          Comparative studies
          Visual perception
          Research funding
          Descriptive statistics
          Statistical models
          Kinematics
      ab: Purpose: Prior work has demonstrated that competing tasks impact habitual speech production. The purpose of this investigation was to quantify the extent to which clear and loud speech are affected by concurrent performance of an attention-demanding task. Method: Speech kinematics and acoustics were collected while participants spoke using habitual, loud, and clear speech styles. The styles were performed in isolation and while performing a secondary tracking task. Results: Compared to the habitual style, speakers exhibited expected increases in lip aperture range of motion and speech intensity for the clear and loud styles. During concurrent visuomotor tracking, there was a decrease in lip aperture range of motion and speech intensity for the habitual style. Tracking performance during habitual speech did not differ from single-task tracking. For loud and clear speech, speakers retained the gains in speech intensity and range of motion, respectively, while concurrently tracking. A reduction in tracking performance was observed during concurrent loud and clear speech, compared to tracking alone. Conclusions: These data suggest that loud and clear speech may help to mitigate motor interference associated with concurrent performance of an attention-demanding task. Additionally, reductions in tracking accuracy observed during concurrent loud and clear speech may suggest that these higher effort speaking styles require greater attentional resources than habitual speech.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N