Intelligent action guidance and the use of mixed representational formats.

My topic is the intelligent guidance of action. In this paper I offer an empirically grounded case for four ideas: that [a] cognitive processes of practical reasoning play a key role in the intelligent guidance of action, [b] these processes could not do so without significant enabling work done by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 198; pp. 4143 - 4163
Autor principal: Shepherd, Joshua
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jul2021 Supplement 17
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=151438193&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 151438193
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2021 Supplement 17
      vid: 198
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        151438193
        10.1007/s11229-018-1892-7
      ppf: 4143
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 474KB
      tig:
        atl: Intelligent action guidance and the use of mixed representational formats.
      aug:
        au: Shepherd, Joshua
        affil:
          Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
          Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
      su:
        Practical reason
        Syllogism
        Psychological feedback
        Philosophers
      sug:
        subj:
          Practical reason
          Syllogism
          Psychological feedback
          Philosophers
      keyword:
        Action guidance
        Interface problem
        Object perception
        Representational format
      ab: My topic is the intelligent guidance of action. In this paper I offer an empirically grounded case for four ideas: that [a] cognitive processes of practical reasoning play a key role in the intelligent guidance of action, [b] these processes could not do so without significant enabling work done by both perception and the motor system, [c] the work done by perceptual and motor systems can be characterized as the generation of information (often conceptually structured information) specialized for action guidance, which in turn suggests that [d] the cognitive processes of practical reasoning that play a key role in the guidance of intelligent action are not the abstract, syllogistic ones philosophers often treat as the paradigm of practical reasoning. Rather, these cognitive processes are constrained by, and work well with, the specialized concepts outputted by perception and the feedback outputted by sensorimotor processes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2021. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N