Limit your body area -a COVID-19 mass radicalisation challenging autonomy and basic human rights.
Purpose: This paper aims to explore articulations of how individuals internalise official demands on handling COVID-19 and the function of social media in this process, and further to discuss this from a human rights' perspective. Design/methodology/approach: A thematic analysis of qualitative data...
| Publicado en: | International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare Vol. 14; no. 3; pp. 192 - 209 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Emerald Publishing Limited
2021
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=151508283&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 151508283 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 20564902 JX65 jtl: International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare issn: 20564902 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2021 vid: 14 iid: 3 pid: 465 pub: Emerald Publishing Limited artinfo: ui: 151508283 151508283 151508283 10.1108/IJHRH-07-2020-0055 151508283 ppf: 192 ppct: 17 formats: tig: atl: Limit your body area -a COVID-19 mass radicalisation challenging autonomy and basic human rights. aug: au: Glasdam, Stinne Stjernswärd, Sigrid affil: Integrative Health Research, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden sug: subj: COVID-19 Human Rights Autonomy Social Media Human Male Female Adult Middle Age Thematic Analysis Qualitative Studies Social Constructionism Socialization Conceptual Framework Summated Rating Scaling Snowball Sample Descriptive Statistics Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Male Female ab: Purpose: This paper aims to explore articulations of how individuals internalise official demands on handling COVID-19 and the function of social media in this process, and further to discuss this from a human rights' perspective. Design/methodology/approach: A thematic analysis of qualitative data from an international survey on COVID-19 and social media. The analysis was inspired by Berger and Luckmann's theory of reality as a social construction. Findings: Articulations expressed an instant internalisation and externalisation of the officially defined "new normal". However, negotiations of this "new normal" were articulated, whereby everyday life activities could proceed. Resistance to the "new normal" appeared, as routines and common sense understandings of everyday life were threatened. Health-care professionals were put in a paradoxical situation, living in accordance with the "new normal" outside work and legitimately deviating from it at work. The "new normal" calls for individuals' "oughtonomy" rather than autonomy. Social media were used to push individual's re-socialisation into the "new normal". The latter both promoted and challenged human rights as the individual's right to self-determination extends beyond the self as it risks threatening other people's right to life. Originality/value: With the means of a theoretically based thematic analysis inspired by Berger and Luckmann, the current study shows how articulations on COVID-19 and social media can both support and challenge human rights and reality as a facticity as dictated by dominant organisations and discourses in society. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|