A combined stepping and visual tracking task predicts cognitive decline in older adults better than gait or visual tracking tasks alone: a prospective study.

Background: It is unclear whether motor-cognitive dual tasks predict cognitive decline better than either motor or cognitive tasks alone. Aims: To examine the utility of the novel motor-cognitive dual-task test [Stepping Trail Making Test (S-TMT)], as a predictor of cognitive decline, and compare it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Aging Clinical & Experimental Research Vol. 33; no. 7; pp. 1865 - 1874
Autores principales: Osuka, Yosuke, Kim, Hunkyung, Watanabe, Yutaka, Taniguchi, Yu, Kojima, Narumi, Seino, Satoshi, Kawai, Hisashi, Sakurai, Ryota, Inagaki, Hiroki, Awata, Shuichi, Shinkai, Shoji
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Jul2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Background: It is unclear whether motor-cognitive dual tasks predict cognitive decline better than either motor or cognitive tasks alone. Aims: To examine the utility of the novel motor-cognitive dual-task test [Stepping Trail Making Test (S-TMT)], as a predictor of cognitive decline, and compare its predictive performance with single motor or cognitive tests. Methods: This 2-year population-based prospective study included 626 adults aged ≥ 70 years from Takashimadaira, Itabashi, Tokyo. The S-TMT measured the time taken to step on 16 numbers in order. Gait speed and TMT-A were assessed with standardized methods as single motor and cognitive tasks, respectively. A decline in the Mini-Mental State Examination score by ≥ 3 points over 2 years was defined as a significant cognitive decline. Results: Over 2 years, 97 (15.5%) experienced cognitive decline. After adjusting for confounders, binary logistic regression models showed no significant associations between gait speed, TMT-A time tertiles, and risk of cognitive decline, but participants in the longest tertile of S-TMT time were more likely to develop cognitive decline than those of the shortest tertile (odds ratio 2.14; 95% confidence interval 1.17–3.90). Only the addition of the S-TMT time to the covariates model significantly improved the reclassification indices for predicting cognitive decline (net reclassification improvement: 0.31, P < 0.01; integrated discrimination improvement: 0.01, P = 0.02). Discussion and conclusion: Only the S-TMT was significantly associated with cognitive decline and improved reclassification indices, indicating that it is more useful for predicting cognitive decline than individual gait speed or visual tracking tests alone.