Eye Gaze During Controversial Conversations Depends on Agreement and Conversational Role.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of conversational role (speaking versus listening) and conversational agreement (agreement versus disagreement) on eye gaze toward the interlocutor in the context of controversial, political conversations. Previous studies have only examined these...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Vol. 45; no. 3; pp. 351 - 367 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Sep2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=151566973&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 151566973 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01915886 JNV jtl: Journal of Nonverbal Behavior issn: 01915886 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Sep2021 vid: 45 iid: 3 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 151566973 10.1007/s10919-021-00363-5 ppf: 351 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1MB tig: atl: Eye Gaze During Controversial Conversations Depends on Agreement and Conversational Role. aug: au: Tyler, Cali Light, Sam Notthoff, Anika Cacciamani, Laura affil: Department of Psychology & Child Development, California Polytechnic State University, Bldg 47, Room 24 1 Grand Ave, 93407, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA su: Practical politics Conversation Communication Eye movements Comparative studies Video recording sug: subj: Practical politics Conversation Communication Eye movements Comparative studies Video recording keyword: Conversational agreement Conversational role Eye gaze Nonverbal communication Politics Conversational agreement Conversational role Eye gaze Nonverbal communication Politics ab: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of conversational role (speaking versus listening) and conversational agreement (agreement versus disagreement) on eye gaze toward the interlocutor in the context of controversial, political conversations. Previous studies have only examined these variables independently of one another and typically not in face-to-face conversations. Participants briefly discussed four historically partisan social issues with an experimental confederate posing as a participant, who either agreed or disagreed with the viewpoints endorsed by the participant. Participants' gaze toward the confederate was recorded using a hidden video camera. Consistent with previous research, our results showed that participants looked at the confederate more when listening than speaking. Notably, the magnitude of this listening-speaking difference depended on agreement condition; compared to a baseline non-controversial conversation, disagreement (but not agreement) exacerbated the listening-speaking difference, particularly by increasing gaze during listening. Follow-up analyses showed that emotion, gender, and political ideology did not moderate this effect. Together, these results shed light on factors that affect eye gaze during politically-charged conversations and show that both conversational role and level of agreement work together to exert an influence. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|