Conformity in scientific networks.

Scientists are generally subject to social pressures, including pressures to conform with others in their communities, that affect achievement of their epistemic goals. Here we analyze a network epistemology model in which agents, all else being equal, prefer to take actions that conform with those...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 198; no. 8; pp. 7257 - 7279
Autores principales: Weatherall, James Owen, O'Connor, Cailin
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=151648023&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 151648023
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2021
      vid: 198
      iid: 8
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        151648023
        10.1007/s11229-019-02520-2
      ppf: 7257
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1017KB
      tig:
        atl: Conformity in scientific networks.
      aug:
        au:
          Weatherall, James Owen
          O'Connor, Cailin
        affil: Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, University of California, 92697-5100, Irvine, CA, USA
      su:
        Conformity
        Social pressure
        Goal (Psychology)
        Theory of knowledge
      sug:
        subj:
          Conformity
          Social pressure
          Goal (Psychology)
          Theory of knowledge
      keyword:
        Epistemic networks
        False beliefs
        Small worlds
      ab: Scientists are generally subject to social pressures, including pressures to conform with others in their communities, that affect achievement of their epistemic goals. Here we analyze a network epistemology model in which agents, all else being equal, prefer to take actions that conform with those of their neighbors. This preference for conformity interacts with the agents' beliefs about which of two (or more) possible actions yields the better result. We find a range of possible outcomes, including stable polarization in belief and action. The model results are sensitive to network structure. In general, though, conformity has a negative effect on a community's ability to reach accurate consensus about the world.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2021. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N