Reliability of mathematical inference.

Of all the demands that mathematics imposes on its practitioners, one of the most fundamental is that proofs ought to be correct. It has been common since the turn of the twentieth century to take correctness to be underwritten by the existence of formal derivations in a suitable axiomatic foundatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Synthese Vol. 198; no. 8; pp. 7377 - 7400
Main Author: Avigad, Jeremy
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Aug2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=151648027&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 151648027
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2021
      vid: 198
      iid: 8
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        151648027
        10.1007/s11229-019-02524-y
      ppf: 7377
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 346KB
      tig:
        atl: Reliability of mathematical inference.
      aug:
        au: Avigad, Jeremy
        affil:
          Department of Philosophy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA
          Department of Mathematical Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA
      su:
        Mathematical proofs
        Twentieth century
        Accounting standards
        Evidence
      sug:
        subj:
          Mathematical proofs
          Twentieth century
          Accounting standards
          Evidence
      keyword:
        Formalization
        Mathematical proof
        Reliability
        Robustness
      ab: Of all the demands that mathematics imposes on its practitioners, one of the most fundamental is that proofs ought to be correct. It has been common since the turn of the twentieth century to take correctness to be underwritten by the existence of formal derivations in a suitable axiomatic foundation, but then it is hard to see how this normative standard can be met, given the differences between informal proofs and formal derivations, and given the inherent fragility and complexity of the latter. This essay describes some of the ways that mathematical practice makes it possible to reliably and robustly meet the formal standard, preserving the standard normative account while doing justice to epistemically important features of informal mathematical justification.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2021. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N