Barriers and facilitators to general practitioners participating in implementation research: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.
Objective: The aim of the review is to critically appraise and synthesize quantitative and qualitative evidence on the barriers and facilitators to general practitioners participating in implementation research for the purposes of evaluating translation of evidence into practice. Introduction: Gener...
| Publicado en: | JBI Evidence Synthesis Vol. 19; no. 6; pp. 1354 - 1362 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | protocol tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Jun2021
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=151652549&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 151652549 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 26898381 MFQS jtl: JBI Evidence Synthesis issn: 26898381 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2021 vid: 19 iid: 6 pid: 433 pub: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins place: Baltimore, Maryland artinfo: ui: 151652549 151652549 151652549 10.11124/JBIES-20-00187 151652549 ppf: 1354 ppct: 8 formats: tig: atl: Barriers and facilitators to general practitioners participating in implementation research: a mixed methods systematic review protocol. aug: au: Sargent, Lucy Taylor, Jane Lowe, John affil: School of Health and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia sug: subj: Implementation Science Research, Medical Physicians, Family Research Subject Recruitment Physician Attitudes Multimethod Studies Systematic Review ab: Objective: The aim of the review is to critically appraise and synthesize quantitative and qualitative evidence on the barriers and facilitators to general practitioners participating in implementation research for the purposes of evaluating translation of evidence into practice. Introduction: General practice is a distinct medical specialty that requires its own specific research; therefore, general practitioner participation in research is key in translating new knowledge into practice. However, recruiting general practitioners to research as participants is challenging. Understanding general practitioner behavior in relation to their participation in implementation research is critical. Inclusion criteria: Implementation studies that include general practitioners in primary health care settings will be considered. This review will consider quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies from developed countries investigating barriers and facilitators to general practitioners participating in implementation research. Methods: The review will be conducted in accordance with JBI methodology for mixed methods systematic reviews. The main databases accessed will be MEDLINE and Scopus, and include studies published in English between 2008 and the present. Two independent reviewers will read and screen relevant articles, assess for quality, extract study characteristics, and synthesize data. This review is taking an integrated approach involving transformed quantitative data. Primary outcome measures will include study details and outcomes related to the research question. Qualitative and transformed quantitative data will be mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework at extraction phase. Synthesis will include identified barriers and facilitators categorized using the Theoretical Domains Framework indicators to provide future research and implementation recommendations for recruiting general practitioners to implementation research. Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO (CRD42020176759) pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: protocol tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|