Spirometric Response to Bronchodilator and Eucapnic Voluntary Hyperpnea in Adults With Asthma.

BACKGROUND: The spirometric response to fast-acting bronchodilator is used clinically to diagnose asthma and in clinical research to verify its presence. However, bronchodilator responsiveness does not correlate with airway hyper-responsiveness measured with the direct-acting stimulus of methacholin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Respiratory Care Vol. 66; no. 8; pp. 1282 - 1291
Autores principales: Haverkamp, Hans Christian, Kaminsky, David A., McPherson, Sterling M., Irvin, Charles G.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Aug2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=151671548&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 151671548
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00201324
        4GG
      jtl: Respiratory Care
      issn: 00201324
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2021
      vid: 66
      iid: 8
      pid: 1365
      pub: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
      place: New Rochelle, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        151671548
        151671548
        151671548
        10.4187/respcare.08421
        151671548
      ppf: 1282
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Spirometric Response to Bronchodilator and Eucapnic Voluntary Hyperpnea in Adults With Asthma.
      aug:
        au:
          Haverkamp, Hans Christian
          Kaminsky, David A.
          McPherson, Sterling M.
          Irvin, Charles G.
        affil: Department of Nutrition and Exercise Physiology, Washington State University-Health Sciences Spokane, Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, Washington
      sug:
        subj:
          Asthma Drug Therapy
          Bronchodilator Agents Therapeutic Use
          Respiratory Hypersensitivity
          Human
          Female
          Male
          Adult
          Spirometry
          Retrospective Design
          Research Subject Recruitment
          Consent (Research)
          Forced Expiratory Volume
          Forced Expiratory Flow Rates
          Bronchoconstriction
          Body Mass Index
          Descriptive Statistics
          Kruskal-Wallis Test
          Matched-Pair Analysis
          Mann-Whitney U Test
          Post Hoc Analysis
          T-Tests
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          Correlation Coefficient
          Statistical Significance
          Data Analysis Software
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: BACKGROUND: The spirometric response to fast-acting bronchodilator is used clinically to diagnose asthma and in clinical research to verify its presence. However, bronchodilator responsiveness does not correlate with airway hyper-responsiveness measured with the direct-acting stimulus of methacholine, demonstrating that bronchodilator responsiveness is a problematic method for diagnosing asthma. The relationship between bronchodilator responsiveness and airway hyper-responsiveness assessed with indirect-acting stimuli is not known. METHODS: Retrospectively, the spirometric responses to inhaled bronchodilator and a eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea challenge (EVH) were compared in 39 non-smoking adult subjects with asthma (26 male, 13 female; mean ± SD age 26.9 ± 7.8 y; mean ± SD body mass index 26.3 ± 4.7 kg/m²). All subjects met one or both of 2 criteria: ≥ 12% and 200 mL increase in FEV1 after inhaled bronchodilator, and ≥ 10% decrease in FEV1 after an EVH challenge. RESULTS: Overall, FEV1 increased by 9.9 ≥ 7.9% after bronchodilator (3.93 ± 0.97 to 4.28 ± 0.91 L, P < .001) and decreased by 23.9 ± 15.0% after the EVH challenge (3.89 ± 0.89 to 2.96 6 0.88 L, P < .001). However, the change in FEV1 after bronchodilator did not correlate with the change after EVH challenge (r = 0.062, P = .71). Significant bronchodilator responsiveness predicted a positive response to EVH challenge in 9 of 33 subjects (sensitivity 27%). Following EVH, the change in FEV1 strongly correlated with the change in FVC (FEV1 percent change vs FVC percent change, r = 0.831, P < .001; FEV1 DL vs FVC DL, r = 0.799, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: These results extend previous findings that demonstrate a lack of association between bronchodilator responsiveness and methacholine responsiveness. Given the poor concordance between the spirometric response to fast-acting bronchodilator and the EVH challenge, these findings suggest that the airway response to inhaled β2-agonist must be interpreted with caution and in the context of its determinants and limitations.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N