Digging In and Branching Out: Collaborative Processes of Building, Embedding, and Evolving Online Interactive Learning Modules for Library Instruction.

This case study reflects on a long-term collaborative partnership between librarians and writing program administrators to plan, build, implement, and significantly revise two course-specific online learning modules. Of particular interest are contrasts between phase-delineated instructional systems...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning Vol. 15; no. 2; pp. 129 - 142
Autor principal: Ezell, Jon
Formato: case study Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jun2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=151679791&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 151679791
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1533290X
        88O
      jtl: Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning
      issn: 1533290X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2021
      vid: 15
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        151679791
        151038451
        151679791
        151679791
        10.1080/1533290X.2021.1942387
        151679791
      ppf: 129
      ppct: 13
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Digging In and Branching Out: Collaborative Processes of Building, Embedding, and Evolving Online Interactive Learning Modules for Library Instruction.
      aug:
        au: Ezell, Jon
        affil: University Libraries, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Curriculum Development
          Collaboration
          Online Education
          Learning Methods
          Librarians
          Administrative Personnel
          Conceptual Framework
          Libraries, Academic
          Feedback
          COVID-19
      ab: This case study reflects on a long-term collaborative partnership between librarians and writing program administrators to plan, build, implement, and significantly revise two course-specific online learning modules. Of particular interest are contrasts between phase-delineated instructional systems design frameworks, such as ADDIE, and the often recursive, unpredictable, and messy paths of project development in practice. In describing the evolving uses of the modules within an ecosystem of programmatic library instruction, this study also demonstrates the utility of flexible, iterative, and organic approaches in evaluating, revising, and repurposing instructional design projects to meet unforeseen challenges and opportunities in an academic libraries context.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        case study
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N