Quantifying the mental health burden of the most severe covid-19 restrictions: A natural experiment.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic, and the restrictions required to halt spread of the infection, are associated with increased population burden of moderate to severe symptoms of depression and anxiety. The aim was to quantify the mental health burden of the most severe COVID-19 related restriction...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Affective Disorders Vol. 293; pp. 406 - 415
Autores principales: Fisher, Jane, Tran, Thach, Hammarberg, Karin, Nguyen, Hau, Stocker, Ruby, Rowe, Heather, Sastri, Jayagowri, Popplestone, Sally, Kirkman, Maggie
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Oct2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=151701948&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 151701948
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01650327
        3M9
      jtl: Journal of Affective Disorders
      issn: 01650327
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2021
      vid: 293
      pid: 1004
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        151701948
        151701948
        NLM34246949
        151701948
        10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.060
        NLM34246949
        151701948
      ppf: 406
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Quantifying the mental health burden of the most severe covid-19 restrictions: A natural experiment.
      aug:
        au:
          Fisher, Jane
          Tran, Thach
          Hammarberg, Karin
          Nguyen, Hau
          Stocker, Ruby
          Rowe, Heather
          Sastri, Jayagowri
          Popplestone, Sally
          Kirkman, Maggie
        affil: School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University
      sug:
      ab: Background: The COVID-19 pandemic, and the restrictions required to halt spread of the infection, are associated with increased population burden of moderate to severe symptoms of depression and anxiety. The aim was to quantify the mental health burden of the most severe COVID-19 related restrictions.Methods: A natural experiment in which differences between Australian states and territories in the severity of restrictions for pandemic control, divided the population. People in Victoria experienced the most severe, and people in all other states and territories less severe or negligible restrictions. Data were collected in national, anonymously completed, online surveys (in April and in July / August 2020) of adults in Australia. Outcomes were, in the previous fortnight, experiencing clinically significant depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire 9 score ≥10); or symptoms of generalised anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale 7 score ≥10).Results: In total, 23,749 eligible respondents contributed complete data. There were no differences in the population burden of mental health problems between Victoria and the other states and territories at Survey One. By Survey Two prevalence rates of clinically significant depressive (Adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 1.96; 95% CI 1.62; 2.37) and anxiety (aOR 1.87; 95%CI 1.53; 2.29) symptoms were substantially and significantly higher in Victoria than in other states and territories.Limitations: Online surveys are less accessible to some groups of people. The data are self-report and not diagnostic.Conclusions: The most severe COVID-19 restrictions are associated with near double the population prevalence of moderate to severe depressive and generalised anxiety symptoms.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N