Language patterns of outgroup prejudice.

Although explicit verbal expression of prejudice and stereotypes may have become less common due to the recent rise of social norms against prejudice, prejudice in language still persists in more subtle forms. It remains unclear whether and how language patterns predict variance in prejudice across...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cognition Vol. 215
Main Authors: Li, Ying, T. Hills, Thomas, Hills, Thomas
Format: research Journal Article
Published: Elsevier B.V. Oct2021
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=151814496&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 151814496
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00100277
        3H9
      jtl: Cognition
      issn: 00100277
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2021
      vid: 215
      pid: 1004
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        151814496
        151814496
        NLM34192608
        151814496
        10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104813
        NLM34192608
        151814496
      ppct: 1
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Language patterns of outgroup prejudice.
      aug:
        au:
          Li, Ying
          T. Hills, Thomas
          Hills, Thomas
        affil: Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
      sug:
        subj:
          Language
          Prejudice
          Human
          Politics
          Group Processes
          Comparative Studies
          Multicenter Studies
          Evaluation Research
          Validation Studies
      ab: Although explicit verbal expression of prejudice and stereotypes may have become less common due to the recent rise of social norms against prejudice, prejudice in language still persists in more subtle forms. It remains unclear whether and how language patterns predict variance in prejudice across a large number of minority groups. Informed by construal level theory, intergroup-contact theory, and linguistic expectancy bias, we leverage a natural language corpus of 1.8 million newspaper articles to investigate patterns of language referencing 60 U.S. minority groups. We found that perception of social distance among immigrant groups is reflected in language production: Groups perceived as socially distant (vs. close) are also more likely to be mentioned in abstract (vs. concrete) language. Concreteness was also strongly positively correlated with sentiment, a phenomenon that was unique to language concerning minority groups, suggesting a strong tendency for more socially distant groups to be represented with more negative language. We also provide a qualitative exploration of the content of outgroup prejudice by applying Latent Dirichlet Allocation to language referencing minority groups in the context of immigration. We identified 15 immigrant-related topics (e.g., politics, arts, crime, illegal workers, museums, food) and the strength of their association and relationship with perceived sentiment for each minority group. This research demonstrates how perceived social distance and language concreteness are related and correlate with outgroup negativity, provides a practical and ecologically valid method for investigating perceptions of minority groups in language, and helps elaborate the connection between theoretical positions from social psychology with recent studies from computer science on prejudice embedded in natural language.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N