Clinical Utility of a Reaction-Time Attention Task in the Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment in Elderly with High Educational Disparity.

Background: The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale is commonly used to stage cognitive impairment, despite having educational limitations. In elderly with low education, a previous study has shown that intraindividual variability of reaction time (CV) and commission errors (CE), measured using a c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Vol. 81; no. 2; pp. 691 - 698
Autores principales: Schmidt, Sergio L., Boechat, Yolanda Eliza Moreira, Schmidt, Guilherme J., Nicaretta, Denise, van Duinkerken, Eelco, Schmidt, Juliana J.
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. 2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=151821085&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 151821085
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13872877
        FLR
      jtl: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
      issn: 13872877
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2021
      vid: 81
      iid: 2
      pid: 20732
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        151821085
        151821085
        NLM33814451
        151821085
        10.3233/JAD-210151
        NLM33814451
        151821085
      ppf: 691
      ppct: 7
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Clinical Utility of a Reaction-Time Attention Task in the Evaluation of Cognitive Impairment in Elderly with High Educational Disparity.
      aug:
        au:
          Schmidt, Sergio L.
          Boechat, Yolanda Eliza Moreira
          Schmidt, Guilherme J.
          Nicaretta, Denise
          van Duinkerken, Eelco
          Schmidt, Juliana J.
        affil: Department of Neurology, Federal University of The State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
      sug:
        subj:
          Cognition Disorders Physiopathology
          Alzheimer's Disease Physiopathology
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Attention
          Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis
          Severity of Illness Indices
          Male
          Cognition Disorders Diagnosis
          Cognition
          Female
          Disease Progression
          Human
          Aged
          Educational Status
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Comparative Studies
          Multicenter Studies
          Evaluation Research
          Validation Studies
          Scales
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale is commonly used to stage cognitive impairment, despite having educational limitations. In elderly with low education, a previous study has shown that intraindividual variability of reaction time (CV) and commission errors (CE), measured using a culture-free Go/No-Go task, can reliably distinguish early Alzheimer's disease (AD) from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and healthy controls.Objective: We aimed to extend the clinical utility of this culture-free Go/No-Go task in a sample with high educational disparity.Methods: One hundred and ten participants with a wide range of years of formal education (0-14 years) were randomly selected from a geriatric unit and divided based on their CDR scores into cognitively unimpaired (CDR = 0), MCI (CDR = 0.5), and early AD (CDR = 1). All underwent a 90-s reaction-time test that measured the variables previously found to predict CDR in low educated elderly. Here we added years of formal education (educational level) to the model. Multivariate analyses compared differences in group means using educational level as confounding factor. A confirmatory discriminant analyses was performed, to assess if CDR scores could be predicted by the two Go/No-Go variables in a sample with high educational disparity.Results: Over all three groups, differences in both CE and CV reached statistical significance (p < 0.05). The discriminant analysis demonstrated that CV and CE discriminated cognitively impaired from cognitively normal elderly. These results remained similar when discriminating MCI from cognitively unimpaired elderly.Conclusion: The Go/No-Go task reliably discriminates elderly with MCI from elderly without cognitive impairment independent of educational disparity.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N