Scales of Practices and Outcomes for Community‐Engaged Research.
Despite the growth of research on community‐engaged research (CEnR), recent reviews suggest there has been limited development of validated scales to measure key contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes, impairing testing and refinement of theoretical models. The purpose of this study is to present the ps...
| Publicado en: | American Journal of Community Psychology Vol. 67; no. 3/4; pp. 256 - 271 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jun2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=151836743&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 151836743 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00910562 CMP jtl: American Journal of Community Psychology issn: 00910562 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2021 vid: 67 iid: 3/4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 151836743 10.1002/ajcp.12503 ppf: 256 ppct: 15 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: C – @attributes: type: P size: 270KB tig: atl: Scales of Practices and Outcomes for Community‐Engaged Research. aug: au: Boursaw, Blake Oetzel, John G. Dickson, Elizabeth Thein, Thomas S. Sanchez‐Youngman, Shannon Peña, Juan Parker, Myra Magarati, Maya Littledeer, Lenora Duran, Bonnie Wallerstein, Nina affil: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque NM,, USA University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand University of Wisconsin‐Madison, Madison WI,, USA University of Washington, Seattle WA,, USA su: Psychometrics Confirmatory factor analysis Community-based participatory research Self-efficacy Test validity sug: subj: Psychometrics Confirmatory factor analysis Community-based participatory research Self-efficacy Test validity keyword: Community‐based participatory research Community‐engaged research Empowerment Measurement Community‐based participatory research Community‐engaged research Empowerment Measurement ab: Despite the growth of research on community‐engaged research (CEnR), recent reviews suggest there has been limited development of validated scales to measure key contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes, impairing testing and refinement of theoretical models. The purpose of this study is to present the psychometric properties of scales from the Engage for Equity (E2) project, stemming from a long‐term research partnership examining community‐engaged research projects. This study used a three‐stage, cross‐sectional format: (a) a sampling frame of 413 CEnR projects was identified; (b) 210 principal investigators completed a project‐level survey and nominated partners for another survey; (c) 457 investigators and partners completed a survey about project contexts, processes, interventions, and outcomes. Factorial validity was established through confirmatory factor analysis supporting seven scales: contextual capacity, commitment to collective empowerment, relationships, community engagement in research actions, synergy, partner and partnership transformation, and projected outcomes. Convergent validity was established through examining covariances among the scales. This study largely yielded results consistent with a previous psychometric study of related measures, while demonstrating improved ceiling effects of the items and refined conceptualization of core theoretical constructs. Highlights: Validation of seven scales of practices and outcomes across four CBPR Model domains.Validated scales include seven novel subscales while also showing consistency with prior work.Results suggest Commitment to Collective Empowerment as a key driver of CPBR/CEnR. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|