PRIMARY ELECTIONS IN THE USA: BETWEEN REPUBLICANISM AND DEMOCRACY.

The aim of this article is to highlight the ambivalences of the US primaries. With primaries citizens -- and not party elites -- can determine the party candidates for an election. After decades of attempting to introduce them (which will be discussed in section 2), they have now become a common pra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Topos (18150047) no. 1; pp. 55 - 73
Autor principal: Jeremias, Ralf
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: European Humanities University 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=151846753&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 151846753
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        18150047
        32FG
      jtl: Topos (18150047)
      issn: 18150047
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2021
      iid: 1
      pid: 33650
      pub: European Humanities University
    artinfo:
      ui: 151846753
      ppf: 55
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 2.7MB
      tig:
        atl: PRIMARY ELECTIONS IN THE USA: BETWEEN REPUBLICANISM AND DEMOCRACY.
      aug:
        au: Jeremias, Ralf
        affil: Researcher and lecturer, Department of Sociology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany
      su:
        Arendt, Hannah, 1906-1975
        Campaign funds
        Primaries
        Trump, Donald, 1946-
        Gubernatorial elections
        Political parties
        Political campaigns
        Republicanism
        Democracy
      sug:
        subj:
          Arendt, Hannah, 1906-1975
          Campaign funds
          Primaries
          Trump, Donald, 1946-
          Gubernatorial elections
          Political parties
          Political campaigns
          Republicanism
          Democracy
      keyword:
        democracy
        election
        primaries
        republic
        republicanism
        Trump
        USA
      ab: The aim of this article is to highlight the ambivalences of the US primaries. With primaries citizens -- and not party elites -- can determine the party candidates for an election. After decades of attempting to introduce them (which will be discussed in section 2), they have now become a common practice for both parties to select candidates for presidential and other (e.g. gubernatorial) elections. While the direct influence of citizens on candidate selection has often been praised as a genuine democratic achievement, it is debatable whether all groups in society have an equal opportunity to stand in primaries (section 3). It turns out that super-rich businessmen are overrepresented, and that this is intrinsic to the campaign financing system, because they can partially finance their election campaigns with their own money if needed. Furthermore, the constitutive function of primaries also pertains to their potential capacity to enable political innovation, as they make it possible for new ideas and new actors to get into the parties and the political arena. Notably, they enable actors who were not previously active in politics to enter the republican (in Hannah Arendt's words) 'space of appearance'. In order to examine the ambivalences and contradictions of primaries, Hanna Arendt's distinction between the republican and the democratic is discussed in section 4, with the result that primaries appear as complex political institutions that combine, partly in contradictory terms, normative understandings of republicanism and democracy. The article concludes with the argument that the ambivalences and complexities inherent in the US primaries, as well as their unintended side effects, do not speak against primaries as such, but rather call for the introduction of rules regulating their implementation.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Topos (18150047) is the property of European Humanities University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Topos (18150047)
      holder: European Humanities University
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N