Autopoietic enactivism: action and representation re-examined under Peirce's light.
The purpose of this article is to start a dialogue between the so-called autopoietic enactivism and the semiotic pragmatism of C. S. Peirce, in order to re-examine both action and representation under a Peircean light. The focus lays on autopoietic enactivism because this approach offers a wider the...
| Publicado en: | Synthese Vol. 198; pp. 461 - 484 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jan2021 Supplement 1
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=151879573&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 151879573 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00397857 4LI jtl: Synthese issn: 00397857 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan2021 Supplement 1 vid: 198 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 151879573 10.1007/s11229-019-02457-6 ppf: 461 ppct: 23 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 312KB tig: atl: Autopoietic enactivism: action and representation re-examined under Peirce's light. aug: au: Fanaya, Patrícia Fonseca affil: Programa de Pós-graduação em Filosofia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), R. Prof. Pedro V. Parigot de Souza 1501 ap. 31, 81200-100, Mossungue Curitiba, PR, Brazil su: Cognition Cognitive science Pragmatism sug: subj: Cognition Cognitive science Pragmatism keyword: Action Autopoietic enactivism Representation Semiotics ab: The purpose of this article is to start a dialogue between the so-called autopoietic enactivism and the semiotic pragmatism of C. S. Peirce, in order to re-examine both action and representation under a Peircean light. The focus lays on autopoietic enactivism because this approach offers a wider theoretical scope to cognition based on the continuity of life and mind, embodiment, dynamic and non-linear interaction between a system and its environment which are compatible ideas with Peirce's semiotic pragmatism. The term 'pragmatic' has been introduced in cognitive science to reinforce the idea that cognition is a form of practice and to help action-oriented viewpoints to escape representationalism. In this paper, I shall try to demonstrate that Peirce's semiotic pragmatism can be a meaningful methodological path to guide a reconciliation between not only anti-Cartesianism and representation but also representation and action. In order to accomplish this purpose, Peirce's account to action, habit, thought and mind will be addressed through some of the guiding principles of his semiotic—sign and sign action. What follows is the re-examining of the problem of representation—as refuted by autopoietic enactivism—under the light of Peirce's semiotic pragmatism. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2021. All Rights Reserved. item: Synthese holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2021 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|