Cloud Crypto Land.

The supposed disruptive and transformational potential of blockchain technology has received widespread attention in the media, from legislators, and from academics across disciplines. While much of this attention has revolved around cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, many see the true promise of blo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Modern Law Review Vol. 84; no. 5; pp. 974 - 1005
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=151881873&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 151881873
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00267961
        D8H
      jtl: Modern Law Review
      issn: 00267961
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2021
      vid: 84
      iid: 5
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        151881873
        10.1111/1468-2230.12603
      ppf: 974
      ppct: 31
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 319KB
      tig:
        atl: Cloud Crypto Land.
      aug:
      su:
        Cloud computing
        Distributed computing
        Blockchains
        Bitcoin
        Forensic orations
      sug:
        subj:
          Cloud computing
          Distributed computing
          Blockchains
          Bitcoin
          Forensic orations
      ab: The supposed disruptive and transformational potential of blockchain technology has received widespread attention in the media, from legislators, and from academics across disciplines. While much of this attention has revolved around cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, many see the true promise of blockchain technology in its potential use for transactions in traditional assets, as well as for facilitating self‐executing 'smart contracts', which replace vague and imprecise natural language with unambiguous computer code. This article presents a simple legal argument against the feasibility of a meaningful blockchain‐based economic system. Blockchain‐based systems are shown to be unsuitable for transactions in traditional assets, unless design choices are made which render the use of the technology pointless. The same argument is shown to apply to smart contracts. Legal and practical obstacles therefore mean that, outside its original realm of cryptocurrencies, blockchain technology is highly unlikely to transform economic interactions in the real world.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Modern Law Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Modern Law Review
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N