Explanatory autonomy: the role of proportionality, stability, and conditional irrelevance.

This paper responds to recent criticisms of the idea that true causal claims, satisfying a minimal "interventionist" criterion for causation, can differ in the extent to which they satisfy other conditions—called stability and proportionality—that are relevant to their use in explanatory theorizing....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 198; no. 1; pp. 237 - 266
Autor principal: Woodward, James
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jan2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=151915701&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 151915701
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2021
      vid: 198
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        151915701
        10.1007/s11229-018-01998-6
      ppf: 237
      ppct: 29
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 579KB
      tig:
        atl: Explanatory autonomy: the role of proportionality, stability, and conditional irrelevance.
      aug:
        au: Woodward, James
        affil: Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA
      su:
        Criticism
        Explanation
        Respect
      sug:
        subj:
          Criticism
          Explanation
          Respect
      keyword:
        Conditional irrelevance
        Interventionism
        Proportionality
        Stability
      ab: This paper responds to recent criticisms of the idea that true causal claims, satisfying a minimal "interventionist" criterion for causation, can differ in the extent to which they satisfy other conditions—called stability and proportionality—that are relevant to their use in explanatory theorizing. It reformulates the notion of proportionality so as to avoid problems with previous formulations. It also introduces the notion of conditional independence or irrelevance, which I claim is central to understanding the respects and the extent to which upper level explanations can be "autonomous".
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2021. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N