Detection and PI-RADS classification of focal lesions in prostate MRI: Performance comparison between a deep learning-based algorithm (DLA) and radiologists with various levels of experience.

Purpose: To compare the performance of lesion detection and Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) classification between a deep learning-based algorithm (DLA), clinical reports and radiologists with different levels of experience in prostate MRI.Methods: This retrospective study inclu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Journal of Radiology Vol. 142
Autores principales: Youn, Seo Yeon, Choi, Moon Hyung, Kim, Dong Hwan, Lee, Young Joon, Huisman, Henkjan, Johnson, Evan, Penzkofer, Tobias, Shabunin, Ivan, Winkel, David Jean, Xing, Pengyi, Szolar, Dieter, Grimm, Robert, von Busch, Heinrich, Son, Yohan, Lou, Bin, Kamen, Ali
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Sep2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=152003356&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 152003356
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0720048X
        3S7
      jtl: European Journal of Radiology
      issn: 0720048X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2021
      vid: 142
      pid: 1004
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        152003356
        152003356
        NLM34388625
        152003356
        10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109894
        NLM34388625
        152003356
      ppct: 1
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Detection and PI-RADS classification of focal lesions in prostate MRI: Performance comparison between a deep learning-based algorithm (DLA) and radiologists with various levels of experience.
      aug:
        au:
          Youn, Seo Yeon
          Choi, Moon Hyung
          Kim, Dong Hwan
          Lee, Young Joon
          Huisman, Henkjan
          Johnson, Evan
          Penzkofer, Tobias
          Shabunin, Ivan
          Winkel, David Jean
          Xing, Pengyi
          Szolar, Dieter
          Grimm, Robert
          von Busch, Heinrich
          Son, Yohan
          Lou, Bin
          Kamen, Ali
        affil: Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
      sug:
        subj:
          Prostatic Neoplasms
          Male
          Magnetic Resonance Imaging
          Retrospective Design
          Scales
          Male
      ab: Purpose: To compare the performance of lesion detection and Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) classification between a deep learning-based algorithm (DLA), clinical reports and radiologists with different levels of experience in prostate MRI.Methods: This retrospective study included 121 patients who underwent prebiopsy MRI and prostate biopsy. More than five radiologists (Reader groups 1, 2: residents; Readers 3, 4: less-experienced radiologists; Reader 5: expert) independently reviewed biparametric MRI (bpMRI). The DLA results were obtained using bpMRI. The reference standard was based on pathologic reports. The diagnostic performance of the PI-RADS classification of DLA, clinical reports, and radiologists was analyzed using AUROC. Dichotomous analysis (PI-RADS cutoff value ≥ 3 or 4) was performed, and the sensitivities and specificities were compared using McNemar's test.Results: Clinically significant cancer [CSC, Gleason score ≥ 7] was confirmed in 43 patients (35.5%). The AUROC of the DLA (0.828) for diagnosing CSC was significantly higher than that of Reader 1 (AUROC, 0.706; p = 0.011), significantly lower than that of Reader 5 (AUROC, 0.914; p = 0.013), and similar to clinical reports and other readers (p = 0.060-0.661). The sensitivity of DLA (76.7%) was comparable to those of all readers and the clinical reports at a PI-RADS cutoff value ≥ 4. The specificity of the DLA (85.9%) was significantly higher than those of clinical reports and Readers 2-3 and comparable to all others at a PI-RADS cutoff value ≥ 4.Conclusions: The DLA showed moderate diagnostic performance at a level between those of residents and an expert in detecting and classifying according to PI-RADS. The performance of DLA was similar to that of clinical reports from various radiologists in clinical practice.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N