Effects of interventions to reduce the negative consequences of interruptions on task performance: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and narrative synthesis of laboratory studies.
A systematic review was conducted to examine the effects of interventions aimed at reducing the negative consequences of interruptions on task performance. Medline, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, and the ABI/INFORM Collection were searched for relevant publications. Thirty-three laboratory-based experiment...
| Publicado en: | Applied Ergonomics Vol. 97 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | research systematic review Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
Nov2021
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=152003555&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 152003555 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00036870 ALO jtl: Applied Ergonomics issn: 00036870 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2021 vid: 97 pid: 82545 pub: Elsevier B.V. place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 152003555 152003555 NLM34273814 152003555 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103506 NLM34273814 152003555 ppct: 1 formats: tig: atl: Effects of interventions to reduce the negative consequences of interruptions on task performance: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and narrative synthesis of laboratory studies. aug: au: Guo, Jingya Chen, Tianrong Xie, Zhenzhen Or, Calvin Kalun affil: Department of Industrial & Manufacturing Systems Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong sug: subj: Task Performance and Analysis Laboratories Human Problem Solving Meta Analysis Systematic Review ab: A systematic review was conducted to examine the effects of interventions aimed at reducing the negative consequences of interruptions on task performance. Medline, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, and the ABI/INFORM Collection were searched for relevant publications. Thirty-three laboratory-based experiments, containing 49 interventions, were reviewed. Seven types of interventions were identified. Overall, the use of interventions significantly increased primary task accuracy (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 1.03, P = 0.001) and reduced resumption lag (SMD = -0.51, P < 0.001), whereas no significant difference was observed for interrupting task accuracy. Subgroup analyses indicated that intervention effects varied by (i) the type of intervention and (ii) the type of primary task (procedural, decision-making, or problem-solving tasks). The narrative synthesis provided additional evidence regarding interruption lag and time spent on a primary task. In sum, this review identified the types of interventions that were particularly effective and provided implications for application and further investigation. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: meta analysis research systematic review Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|