Is parthood identity?

According to a well known, yet controversial metaphysical thesis, Composition is Identity. Recently, Kris McDaniel has articulated and defended a related—and arguably more controversial—thesis, one he calls Parthood is Identity (PI). Roughly the view has it that a whole is, strictly and literally, i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 198; pp. 4503 - 4518
Autor principal: Calosi, Claudio
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2021 Supplement 18
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:According to a well known, yet controversial metaphysical thesis, Composition is Identity. Recently, Kris McDaniel has articulated and defended a related—and arguably more controversial—thesis, one he calls Parthood is Identity (PI). Roughly the view has it that a whole is, strictly and literally, identical to each of its parts considered individually. At first sight, the view seems rather implausible. However, McDaniel's formulation and defense are worthy of a serious discussion. In this paper I put forth such a discussion. The result is what we should have expected all along: PI is not only implausible, but arguably false.