Seeing like an infrastructure: avidity and difference in algorithmic recommendation.

As the influence of algorithmic systems has grown, critics have come to appreciate that algorithms are not autonomous technical forces, but rather heterogeneous sociotechnical systems. The people who build and maintain these infrastructures play integral roles in their functioning: in the tight and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Cultural Studies Vol. 35; no. 4/5; pp. 771 - 792
Autor principal: Seaver, Nick
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jul-Sep2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=152096643&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 152096643
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09502386
        05G
      jtl: Cultural Studies
      issn: 09502386
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul-Sep2021
      vid: 35
      iid: 4/5
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        152096643
        10.1080/09502386.2021.1895248
      ppf: 771
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.5MB
      tig:
        atl: Seeing like an infrastructure: avidity and difference in algorithmic recommendation.
      aug:
        au: Seaver, Nick
        affil: Department of Anthropology, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA
      su:
        Algorithms
        Recommender systems
        Music fans
        Computer software development
        Social theory
        Ethnographic analysis
        Cultural studies
      sug:
        subj:
          Algorithms
          Recommender systems
          Music fans
          Computer software development
          Social theory
          Ethnographic analysis
          Cultural studies
      keyword:
        algorithms
        avidity
        infrastructure
        music
      ab: As the influence of algorithmic systems has grown, critics have come to appreciate that algorithms are not autonomous technical forces, but rather heterogeneous sociotechnical systems. The people who build and maintain these infrastructures play integral roles in their functioning: in the tight and continuous cycles of contemporary software development, the thinking of developers shapes how data drives 'data-driven' organizations. This article contributes to contemporary debates on infrastructural politics by describing how the vernacular social theorizing of one group of developers tangles with their technical work. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork with developers of music recommender systems in the US, I examine how they understand the variability of music listeners. I find that the dominant frame for making sense of listener variation is avidity: a level of enthusiasm for music, which manifests as a willingness to expend effort in finding listening material. For people working in this industry, avidity displaces other ways of understanding human variety – particularly demography. While the technical communities behind these systems were predominantly white and male, they understood the difference that set them apart from most users to be their enthusiasm for music. Centreing avidity provided a way to claim elite cultural status and to avoid talking about demographic diversity. It also reflects the infrastructures through which recommender system developers know and intervene upon their users: avidity is what users look like when seen through interaction logs. Less avid users leave fewer traces, and the goal of the recommender system is to encourage them to leave more. As a result, the figure of the less avid listener serves to justify increasingly rapacious data collection practices.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Cultural Studies is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Cultural Studies
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N