Law-making at nisi prius in the early 1800s.

Presents specifications in law-making at Nisi Prius in the early 1800s. Inconsideration of actions at nisi prius by legal historians to be a fruitful source for tracking the development of the common law; Efficacy of barristers to submit to frequent rulings by the judges that involved the applicatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Legal History Vol. 25; no. 3; pp. 221 - 248
Autor principal: Oldham, James
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Dec2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=15218962&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 15218962
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01440365
        7JG
      jtl: Journal of Legal History
      issn: 01440365
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2004
      vid: 25
      iid: 3
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        15218962
        10.1080/0144036042000296708
      ppf: 221
      ppct: 27
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 138KB
      tig:
        atl: Law-making at nisi prius in the early 1800s.
      aug:
        au: Oldham, James
        affil: Georgetown University Law Center
      su:
        Law enforcement
        Criminal justice system
        Law reform
        Jurisprudence
        Legal ethics
      sug:
        subj:
          Law enforcement
          Criminal justice system
          Law reform
          Jurisprudence
          Legal ethics
      ab: Presents specifications in law-making at Nisi Prius in the early 1800s. Inconsideration of actions at nisi prius by legal historians to be a fruitful source for tracking the development of the common law; Efficacy of barristers to submit to frequent rulings by the judges that involved the application of legal principles; Possibility of the principles to occur at almost any point in the trial.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of Legal History is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of Legal History
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2004
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N