Autonomous algorithmic collusion: Q‐learning under sequential pricing.

Prices are increasingly set by algorithms. One concern is that intelligent algorithms may learn to collude on higher prices even in the absence of the kind of coordination necessary to establish an antitrust infringement. However, exactly how this may happen is an open question. I show how in simula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:RAND Journal of Economics (Wiley-Blackwell) Vol. 52; no. 3; pp. 538 - 559
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=152513498&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 152513498
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07416261
        56RJ
      jtl: RAND Journal of Economics (Wiley-Blackwell)
      issn: 07416261
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2021
      vid: 52
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        152513498
        10.1111/1756-2171.12383
      ppf: 538
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 967KB
      tig:
        atl: Autonomous algorithmic collusion: Q‐learning under sequential pricing.
      aug:
      su:
        Reinforcement learning
        Machine learning
        Collusion
        Algorithms
        Open-ended questions
      sug:
        subj:
          Reinforcement learning
          Machine learning
          Collusion
          Algorithms
          Open-ended questions
      ab: Prices are increasingly set by algorithms. One concern is that intelligent algorithms may learn to collude on higher prices even in the absence of the kind of coordination necessary to establish an antitrust infringement. However, exactly how this may happen is an open question. I show how in simulated sequential competition, competing reinforcement learning algorithms can indeed learn to converge to collusive equilibria when the set of discrete prices is limited. When this set increases, the algorithm considered increasingly converges to supra‐competitive asymmetric cycles. I show that results are robust to various extensions and discuss practical limitations and policy implications.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N