Short-Term Effects of Pressure Controlled Versus Volume Controlled Noninvasive Ventilation in Subjects With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Comparison of the effects of pressure controlled and volume controlled noninvasive ventilations (NIV) has usually been limited to the degree of improvement in blood gases. We compared sleep quality, abnormal respiratory events, and patient-ventilator asynchronies during administration of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Respiratory Care Vol. 66; no. 10; pp. 1593 - 1601
Autores principales: Crescimanno, Grazia, Greco, Francesca, Bertini, Manuela, Arrisicato, Salvo, Marrone, Oreste
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Oct2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=152579694&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 152579694
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00201324
        4GG
      jtl: Respiratory Care
      issn: 00201324
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2021
      vid: 66
      iid: 10
      pid: 1365
      pub: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
      place: New Rochelle, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        152579694
        152579694
        152579694
        10.4187/respcare.09021
        152579694
      ppf: 1593
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Short-Term Effects of Pressure Controlled Versus Volume Controlled Noninvasive Ventilation in Subjects With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.
      aug:
        au:
          Crescimanno, Grazia
          Greco, Francesca
          Bertini, Manuela
          Arrisicato, Salvo
          Marrone, Oreste
        affil: Italian National Research Council, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, Palermo, Italy
      sug:
        subj:
          Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
          Positive Pressure Ventilation Methods
          Noninvasive Procedures
          Blood Gas Analysis
          Sleep Hygiene
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Functional Status
          Spirometry
          Muscle Strength
          Descriptive Statistics
          Mann-Whitney U Test
          T-Tests
          Chi Square Test
          Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient
          Data Analysis Software
          Scales
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: BACKGROUND: Comparison of the effects of pressure controlled and volume controlled noninvasive ventilations (NIV) has usually been limited to the degree of improvement in blood gases. We compared sleep quality, abnormal respiratory events, and patient-ventilator asynchronies during administration of pressure controlled continuous mandatory ventilation (PC-CMV) and volume controlled continuous mandatory ventilation (VC-CMV) in subjects with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis naive to NIV after titration aimed at maximally improving nocturnal arterial blood gases. METHODS: A crossover evaluation of PC-CMV and VC-CMV was performed in 27 subjects with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. After baseline polysomnography, ventilators were set in random order so as to warrant similar and satisfactory oxygen saturation and transcutaneous PCO2 in both NIV modalities during day and night. Soon after titration, polysomnography was repeated during administration of each type of NIV. RESULTS: With respect to the baseline night, non-rapid eye movement 3, and rapid eye movement sleep stages increased, and the arousal index decreased during PC-CMV (P = .005, P = .02, and P = .01, PC-CMV vs VC-CMV, respectively) but not during VC-CMV. The arousal index during NIV was correlated to the peak pressure delivered by the ventilators (p = 0.47, P < .001). Few abnormal respiratory events were observed in both NIV modes. Patient-ventilator asynchronies were more frequent during VC-CMV (median [IQR] 20.8 [0.0 - 22.0] vs 31.8 [30.1 - 34.0] no./h, PC-CMV vs VC-CMV; P = .002). Twenty-one subjects declared that they preferred PC-CMV therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In the short term, PC-CMV may be a preferred NIV modality to VC-CMV for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, even when both NIV modes are similarly effective in the correction of hypoventilation. Evaluation of the effectiveness of NIV should not be limited to the assessment of blood gas correction.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N