Respiratory Mechanics in a Cohort of Critically Ill Subjects With COVID-19 Infection.

BACKGROUND: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often develop acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and receive invasive mechanical ventilation. Much remains unknown about their respiratory mechanics, including the trajectories of pulmonary compliance and PaO2/FIO2, the prognostic value...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Respiratory Care Vol. 66; no. 10; pp. 1601 - 1610
Autores principales: Longino, August, Riveros, Toni, Risa, Erik, Hebert, Chris, Krieger, Joshua, Coppess, Steven, McGuire, Flynn, Bhatraju, Pavan K., Town, James, Johnson, Nicholas J.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Oct2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=152579695&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 152579695
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00201324
        4GG
      jtl: Respiratory Care
      issn: 00201324
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2021
      vid: 66
      iid: 10
      pid: 1365
      pub: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
      place: New Rochelle, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        152579695
        152579695
        152579695
        10.4187/respcare.09064
        152579695
      ppf: 1601
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Respiratory Mechanics in a Cohort of Critically Ill Subjects With COVID-19 Infection.
      aug:
        au:
          Longino, August
          Riveros, Toni
          Risa, Erik
          Hebert, Chris
          Krieger, Joshua
          Coppess, Steven
          McGuire, Flynn
          Bhatraju, Pavan K.
          Town, James
          Johnson, Nicholas J.
        affil: Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
      sug:
        subj:
          Respiratory Mechanics
          Critically Ill Patients
          COVID-19 Prognosis
          Intubation, Intratracheal
          Hospitalization
          Human
          Prospective Studies
          Respiration, Artificial
          Prone Position
          Electronic Health Records
          Survival Analysis
          Patient Compliance
          Survivors
          SARS-CoV-2
          Pneumonia, Viral
          Respiratory Failure
          Anoxemia
          Oxygenation
          Washington
          Descriptive Statistics
          T-Tests
          Analysis of Variance
          Post Hoc Analysis
          kappa Statistic
          Data Analysis Software
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Male
          Female
      ab: BACKGROUND: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often develop acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and receive invasive mechanical ventilation. Much remains unknown about their respiratory mechanics, including the trajectories of pulmonary compliance and PaO2/FIO2, the prognostic value of these parameters, and the effects of prone positioning. We described respiratory mechanics among subjects with COVID-19 who were intubated during the first month of hospitalization. METHODS: We included patients with COVID-19 who were mechanically ventilated between February and May 2020. Daily values of pulmonary compliance, PaO2, FIO2, and the use of prone positioning were abstracted from electronic medical records. The trends were analyzed separately over days 1-10 and days 1-35 of intubation, stratified by prone positioning use, survival, and initial PaO2/FIO2. RESULTS: Among 49 subjects on mechanical ventilation day 1, the mean compliance was 41 mL/cm H2O, decreasing to 25 mL/cm H2O by day 14, the median duration of mechanical ventilation. In contrast, the PaO2/FIO2 on day 1 was similar to day 14. The overall mean compliance was greater among the non-survivors versus the survivors (27 mL/cm H2O vs 24 mL/cm H2O; P = .005), whereas PaO2/FIO2 was higher among the survivors versus the non-survivors over days 1-10 (159 mm Hg vs 138 mm Hg; P = .002) and days 1-35 (175 mm Hg vs 153 mm Hg; P < .001). The subjects who underwent early prone positioning had lower compliance during days 1-10 (27 mL/cm H2O vs 33 mL/cm H2O; P < .001) and lower PaO2/FIO2 values over days 1-10 (139.9 mm Hg vs 167.4 mm Hg; P < .001) versus those who did not undergo prone positioning. After day 21 of hospitalization, the average compliance of the subjects who had early prone positioning surpassed that of the subjects who did not have prone positioning. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory mechanics of the subjects with COVID-19 who were on mechanical ventilation were characterized by persistently low respiratory system compliance and PaO2/FIO2, similar to ARDS due to other etiologies. The PaO2/FIO2 was more tightly associated with mortality than with compliance.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N