Upward pricing pressure in mergers of capacity‐constrained firms.

Merging firms regularly argue that mergers involving capacity‐constrained firms are unlikely to be anticompetitive, because a capacity‐constrained firm does not represent a meaningful competitive constraint on its rivals. We construct a modified notion of upward pricing pressure called ccGUPPI, or c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Economic Inquiry Vol. 59; no. 4; pp. 1723 - 1748
Autores principales: Greenfield, Daniel, Sandford, Jeremy A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Oct2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=152634444&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 152634444
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00952583
        EIQ
      jtl: Economic Inquiry
      issn: 00952583
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2021
      vid: 59
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        152634444
        10.1111/ecin.12999
      ppf: 1723
      ppct: 25
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.3MB
      tig:
        atl: Upward pricing pressure in mergers of capacity‐constrained firms.
      aug:
        au:
          Greenfield, Daniel
          Sandford, Jeremy A.
        affil: Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission, Washington District of Columbia, , USA
      su:
        Monte Carlo method
        Price increases
      sug:
        subj:
          Monte Carlo method
          Price increases
      keyword:
        antitrust
        capacity constraints
        mergers
        antitrust
        capacity constraints
        mergers
      ab: Merging firms regularly argue that mergers involving capacity‐constrained firms are unlikely to be anticompetitive, because a capacity‐constrained firm does not represent a meaningful competitive constraint on its rivals. We construct a modified notion of upward pricing pressure called ccGUPPI, or capacity‐constrained GUPPI, which accounts for upward pricing pressure from binding capacity constraints, in addition to standard merger effects. We show that the pricing pressure terms underlying ccGUPPI, calculated using premerger data, are sufficient to determine whether a merger of capacity‐constrained firms will increase price, irrespective of the functional form of demand. Further, using Monte Carlo simulation, we show that ccGUPPI is generally a useful proxy for actual price effects, with lower informational requirements than full merger simulation.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N