Divination and Ontologies: A Reflection.

The way types of divination move round the planet means it is not helpful to simply attribute one unitary ontology to specific techniques or to groups of practitioners. Explaining divination in terms of 'ontology' homogenizes cognitive and conceptual multiplicity, and pre-empts the possible outcomes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Social Analysis Vol. 65; no. 2; pp. 139 - 161
Autor principal: Zeitlyn, David
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Berghahn Books Jun2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=152770510&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 152770510
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0155977X
        H9B
      jtl: Social Analysis
      issn: 0155977X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2021
      vid: 65
      iid: 2
      pid: 1130
      pub: Berghahn Books
    artinfo:
      ui:
        152770510
        10.3167/sa.2021.650208
      ppf: 139
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1MB
      tig:
        atl: Divination and Ontologies: A Reflection.
      aug:
        au: Zeitlyn, David
        affil: University of Oxford, UK
      su:
        Divination
        Ontology
        Anthropologists
        Persuasion (Psychology)
        Praxis (Process)
        Mambila (African people)
      sug:
        subj:
          Divination
          Ontology
          Anthropologists
          Persuasion (Psychology)
          Praxis (Process)
          Mambila (African people)
      keyword:
        determinism
        divinatory practice
        Mambila spider divination
        ontology
        Schrödinger's spider
        determinism
        divinatory practice
        Mambila spider divination
        ontology
        Schrödinger's spider
      ab: The way types of divination move round the planet means it is not helpful to simply attribute one unitary ontology to specific techniques or to groups of practitioners. Explaining divination in terms of 'ontology' homogenizes cognitive and conceptual multiplicity, and pre-empts the possible outcomes of divination. Moreover, this contradicts the fundamentally open nature of divination, and the fact that in many forms of divination the reformulation of questions helps keep futures open. With examples drawn from Mambila spider divination, I suggest what an epidemiology of beliefs and ontologies that gather around divination could look like. On this account, divination acts as a 'boundary object', mediating both the cognitive differences among clients and the conceptual differences between clients and diviners.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N