Robustness and performance of radiomic features in diagnosing cystic renal masses.

Purpose: We study the inter-reader variability in manual delineation of cystic renal masses (CRMs) presented in computerized tomography (CT) images and its effect on the classification performance of a machine learning algorithm in distinguishing benign from potentially malignant CRMs. In addition,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Abdominal Radiology Vol. 46; no. 11; pp. 5260 - 5268
Autores principales: Könik, Arda, Miskin, Nityanand, Guo, Yang, Shinagare, Atul B., Qin, Lei
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Nov2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=152928186&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 152928186
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        2366004X
        JT14
      jtl: Abdominal Radiology
      issn: 2366004X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2021
      vid: 46
      iid: 11
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        152928186
        151852074
        10.1007/s00261-021-03241-2
        152928186
      ppf: 5260
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Robustness and performance of radiomic features in diagnosing cystic renal masses.
      aug:
        au:
          Könik, Arda
          Miskin, Nityanand
          Guo, Yang
          Shinagare, Atul B.
          Qin, Lei
        affil: Imaging Department, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
      sug:
      ab: Purpose: We study the inter-reader variability in manual delineation of cystic renal masses (CRMs) presented in computerized tomography (CT) images and its effect on the classification performance of a machine learning algorithm in distinguishing benign from potentially malignant CRMs. In addition, we assessed whether the inclusion of higher-order robust radiomic features improves the classification performance over the use of first-order features. Methods: 230 CRMs were independently delineated by two radiologists. Through a combination of random fluctuations, dilation, and erosion operations over the original region of interests (ROIs), we generated four additional sets of synthetic ROIs to capture the inter-reader variability realistically, as confirmed by dice coefficient measurements and visual assessment. We then identified the robust features based on the intra-class coefficient (ICC > 0.85) across these datasets. We applied a tenfold stratified cross-validation (CV) to train and test the performance of the random forest model for the classification of CRMs into benign and potentially malignant. Results: The mean area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.87, 0.82, 0.90, 0.85, and 0.93, respectively. With the usage of first-order features alone, the corresponding values were nearly identical. Conclusion: AUC ranged for the robust and uncorrelated features from 0.83 ± 0.09 to 0.93 ± 0.04 and for the first-order features from 0.84 ± 0.09 to 0.91 ± 0.04. Our study indicates that the first-order features alone are sufficient for the classification of CRMs, and that inclusion of higher-order features does not necessarily improve performance.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N