Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Utility of the ADOS-2 and the ADI-R in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Children.
The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) and the Autism Diagnostic Interview, Revised (ADI-R) have high accuracy as diagnostic instruments in research settings, while evidence of accuracy in clinical settings is less robust. This meta-analysis focused on efficacy of these...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders Vol. 51; no. 11; pp. 4101 - 4115 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Nov2021
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=152974365&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 152974365 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 01623257 AUT jtl: Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders issn: 01623257 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2021 vid: 51 iid: 11 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 152974365 148223028 152974365 152974365 10.1007/s10803-020-04839-z 152974365 ppf: 4101 ppct: 14 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Utility of the ADOS-2 and the ADI-R in Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorders in Children. aug: au: Lebersfeld, Jenna B. Swanson, Marissa Clesi, Christian D. O'Kelley, Sarah E. affil: University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 7th Ave S, 35233, Birmingham, AL, USA sug: subj: Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis Psychological Tests Human Systematic Review Meta Analysis ROC Curve Sensitivity and Specificity Validity ab: The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) and the Autism Diagnostic Interview, Revised (ADI-R) have high accuracy as diagnostic instruments in research settings, while evidence of accuracy in clinical settings is less robust. This meta-analysis focused on efficacy of these measures in research versus clinical settings. Articles (n = 22) were analyzed using a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) model. ADOS-2 performance was stronger than the ADI-R. ADOS-2 sensitivity and specificity ranged from.89-.92 and.81-.85, respectively. ADOS-2 accuracy in research compared with clinical settings was mixed. ADI-R sensitivity and specificity were.75 and.82, respectively, with higher specificity in research samples (Research =.85, Clinical =.72). A small number of clinical studies were identified, indicating ongoing need for investigation outside research settings. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|