Aristotle and Johnston on Hylomorphism and the Character of Objects.
As M. Loux has recently reminded us, there are two basic strategies for explaining the character of particular objects, the 'relational approach' and the 'constituent approach'. The prime example of a constituent approach would be Aristotelian hylomorphism. This article reveals three things. First,...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 100; pp. 62 - 75 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=153088320&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 153088320 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2021 vid: 100 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 153088320 10.15388/Problemos.100.5 ppf: 62 ppct: 13 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.2MB tig: atl: Aristotle and Johnston on Hylomorphism and the Character of Objects. aug: au: Panayides, Christos Y. affil: Department of Social Sciences University of Nicosia, Cyprus su: Aristotle, 384-322 B.C. Virtue ethics Authors sug: subj: Aristotle, 384-322 B.C. Virtue ethics Authors keyword: Aristotle constituent approach essence form hylomorphism Johnston matter Aristotelis esmė forma hilomorfizmas materija sandaros prieiga ab: As M. Loux has recently reminded us, there are two basic strategies for explaining the character of particular objects, the 'relational approach' and the 'constituent approach'. The prime example of a constituent approach would be Aristotelian hylomorphism. This article reveals three things. First, it gives a roadmap towards what the author considers to be the exegetically correct reconstruction of Aristotle's hylomorphic theory. Second, it provides a presentation of the basic claims of a neo-Aristotelian hylomorphic theory, the one argued for by M. Johnston. Finally, it argues that regardless of whatever shortcomings it may have, Aristotle's theory has an advantage over that proposed by Johnston. Unlike Johnston's theory, it may give us a complete account of the character of a particular object. Kaip neseniai mums priminė M. Louxas, yra dvi pagrindinės strategijos, paaiškinančios tam tikrų objektų pobūdį: santykio prieiga ir sandaros prieiga. Pagrindinis sandaros prieigos pavyzdys būtų Aristotelio hilomorfizmas. Šiame straipsnyje atskleidžiami trys dalykai. Pirma, jame pateikiamas planas, ką autorius laiko egzegetiškai korektiška Aristotelio hilomorfizmo teorijos rekonstrukcija. Antra, jame aptariami pagrindiniai M. Johnstono neoaristoteliškos hilomorfizmo teorijos teiginiai. Galiausiai straipsnyje atskleidžiama, kad, nepaisant galimų trūkumų, Aristotelio teorija turi pranašumą prieš Johnstono siūlomą teoriją. Skirtingai nuo Johnstono teorijos, ji gali išsamiai papasakoti apie konkretaus objekto pobūdį. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2021 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|