"The Language of the Unheard": Rioting as a Speech Act.

So - the liberal objection would go - riots involve a basic disrespect for the very ideal of law, and because of this, even if we can sometimes make sense of them as making evaluations and demands, it is not reasonable to expect those speech acts to receive much uptake in the sort of collective deli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy & Public Affairs Vol. 49; no. 4; pp. 379 - 402
Autores principales: Chrisman, Matthew, Hubbs, Graham
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Fall2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=153093645&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 153093645
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00483915
        PPA
      jtl: Philosophy & Public Affairs
      issn: 00483915
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Fall2021
      vid: 49
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        153093645
        10.1111/papa.12201
      ppf: 379
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 186KB
      tig:
        atl: "The Language of the Unheard": Rioting as a Speech Act.
      aug:
        au:
          Chrisman, Matthew
          Hubbs, Graham
      su:
        Civil disobedience
        Riots
        George Floyd protests, 2020
        United States presidential election, 2020
        Anti-racism
        Civil rights movements
        Political participation
      sug:
        subj:
          Civil disobedience
          Riots
          George Floyd protests, 2020
          United States presidential election, 2020
          Anti-racism
          Civil rights movements
          Political participation
      ab: So - the liberal objection would go - riots involve a basic disrespect for the very ideal of law, and because of this, even if we can sometimes make sense of them as making evaluations and demands, it is not reasonable to expect those speech acts to receive much uptake in the sort of collective deliberation that is supposed to be at the heart of democratic self-governance. The addressee and audience of vocative speech acts will often be one and the same, but they may come apart, as in the present example: "Narendra Modi" is a vocative that addresses Modi without constituting him as the speech act's audience. Our focus is on those riots, such as much of what grew out of the BLM protests and out of Trump's rally, that communicate disapproval of the standing political authority. George Floyd was killed in Minneapolis on May 25, 2020, by a white police officer who kneeled on his neck for more than eight minutes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy & Public Affairs is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy & Public Affairs
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N