An Examination of the Relationship Between the Functional Movement Screen, Landing Error Scoring System, and 3D Kinematic Data During a Drop Jump Task.

Everard, E, Lyons, M, and Harrison, AJ. An examination of the relationship between the functional movement screen, landing error scoring system and 3D kinematic data during a drop jump task. J Strength Cond Res 35(11): 3012–3020, 2021—Tests such as the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) and Landing Er...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research Vol. 35; no. 11; pp. 3012 - 3021
Main Authors: Everard, Eoin, Lyons, Mark, Harrison, Andrew J.
Format: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Nov2021
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=153298506&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 153298506
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10648011
        JSC
      jtl: Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
      issn: 10648011
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2021
      vid: 35
      iid: 11
      pid: 5086
      pub: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      place: Baltimore, Maryland
    artinfo:
      ui:
        153298506
        153298506
        153298506
        10.1519/JSC.0000000000003261
        153298506
      ppf: 3012
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: An Examination of the Relationship Between the Functional Movement Screen, Landing Error Scoring System, and 3D Kinematic Data During a Drop Jump Task.
      aug:
        au:
          Everard, Eoin
          Lyons, Mark
          Harrison, Andrew J.
        affil: Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, Physical Education and Sports Science, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
      sug:
        subj:
          Movement Evaluation
          Functional Assessment Methods
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Biomechanics
          Jumping
          Kinematics
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Human
          Male
          Athletes, College
          Variable
          Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient
          T-Tests
          Hip Joint Physiology
          Knee Joint Physiology
          Correlation Coefficient
          Outcome Assessment
          Effect Size
          Descriptive Statistics
          Male
      ab: Everard, E, Lyons, M, and Harrison, AJ. An examination of the relationship between the functional movement screen, landing error scoring system and 3D kinematic data during a drop jump task. J Strength Cond Res 35(11): 3012–3020, 2021—Tests such as the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) and Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) have become an established component of preparticipation screening. Despite their practical use, there is a lack of empirical evidence examining their relationship to established assessments of movement, such as 3D kinematics of a drop jump. Fifty-two male collegiate athletes undertook the LESS, FMS, and a drop jump where 3D lower-limb kinematic variables were assessed. Spearman correlations were conducted to examine the relationship between LESS, FMS, and drop-jump 3D kinematic variables. A series of independent t -tests examined differences in hip and knee kinematic variables in acceptable and poor FMS and LESS groups as determined by established cut-off scores. Landing Error Scoring System scores had significant moderate correlations with most kinematic variables (r = 0.35–0.64; p < 0.01). Subjects with poor LESS scores displayed significantly worse lower-limb kinematics compared with their high-scoring counterparts (effect size = 1.99–2.76, large effect). There were significant moderate correlations with maximal hip and knee flexion (r = 0.46 and 0.39 respectively; p < 0.01) and small or nonsignificant correlations between all other kinematic variables and FMS scores. Hip flexion and knee valgus at maximal displacement were the only kinematic variables significantly different between FMS groups (ES = 0.70–0.72, small-to-moderate effect). The results confirm limitations in the ability of the FMS to distinguish between groups for landing biomechanics.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N