Determination of Perceived Levels of Physical Work Demand Thresholds, and Reliability and Responsiveness of the Modified-Spinal Function Sort Questionnaire in a Multidisciplinary Occupational Rehabilitation Setting.

Purpose: To determine the levels of perceived work demand capacity corresponding to the Modified Spinal Function Sort (M-SFS) score and precise reliability validity and responsiveness. Methods: This prospective validation study included patients with chronic musculoskeletal impairments who underwent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Vol. 31; no. 4; pp. 822 - 831
Autores principales: Burrus, Cyrille, Vuistiner, Philippe, Léger, Bertrand, Luthi, François
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Dec2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=153317787&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 153317787
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10530487
        JOR
      jtl: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
      issn: 10530487
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2021
      vid: 31
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        153317787
        149447119
        153317787
        153317787
        10.1007/s10926-021-09968-5
        153317787
      ppf: 822
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Determination of Perceived Levels of Physical Work Demand Thresholds, and Reliability and Responsiveness of the Modified-Spinal Function Sort Questionnaire in a Multidisciplinary Occupational Rehabilitation Setting.
      aug:
        au:
          Burrus, Cyrille
          Vuistiner, Philippe
          Léger, Bertrand
          Luthi, François
        affil: Department for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Avenue Grand-Champsec 90, 1950, Sion, Switzerland
      sug:
        subj:
          Instrument Validation
          Workload
          Reliability
          Occupational Therapy Practice
          Rehabilitation
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Prospective Studies
          Validation Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          Confidence Intervals
          Questionnaires
          Reliability and Validity
          Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Test-Retest Reliability
          Brief Pain Inventory
          Scales
          ROC Curve
          Internal Consistency
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Purpose: To determine the levels of perceived work demand capacity corresponding to the Modified Spinal Function Sort (M-SFS) score and precise reliability validity and responsiveness. Methods: This prospective validation study included patients with chronic musculoskeletal impairments who underwent multidisciplinary occupational rehabilitation. After determining the percentiles of the work demand thresholds corresponding to the spinal function sort (SFS), the percentiles were transposed to the M-SFS. Reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient and limits of agreement. Correlations with other questionnaires and a lifting task were measured to assess validity. Responsiveness was determined using anchor- and distribution-based approaches. Results: 288 patients were included. The following thresholds were obtained for the M-SFS: 0–43 points, minimal; 44–50, very light; 51–58, light; 59–64, light to medium; 65–70, medium; 71–76, heavy; and 77–80, very heavy. Reliability was confirmed. The correlation between the M-SFS and SFS scores was good at 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86–0.91) and moderate according to the PILE-test result of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.50–0.67). We could not calculate a valid anchor-based minimal clinically important difference. The standard error of measurement was 3.9 points, and the smallest detectable change was 10.8 points. Conclusions: On the basis of the comparison of the M-SFS and SFS scores, the M-SFS score can be interpreted in relation to the levels of work demand. This study confirms the good reliability and validity of the M-SFS questionnaire in assessing perceived physical capacity. Further studies are needed to determine its responsiveness.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N