From many-valued consequence to many-valued connectives.

Given a consequence relation in many-valued logic, what connectives can be defined? For instance, does there always exist a conditional operator internalizing the consequence relation, and which form should it take? In this paper, we pose this question in a multi-premise multi-conclusion setting for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Synthese Vol. 198; pp. 5315 - 5353
Main Authors: Chemla, Emmanuel, Egré, Paul
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Oct2021 Supplement 22
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=153415425&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 153415425
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2021 Supplement 22
      vid: 198
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        153415425
        10.1007/s11229-019-02344-0
      ppf: 5315
      ppct: 38
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 520KB
      tig:
        atl: From many-valued consequence to many-valued connectives.
      aug:
        au:
          Chemla, Emmanuel
          Egré, Paul
        affil:
          Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, Département d'études cognitives, ENS, EHESS, CNRS, PSL University, 75005, Paris, France
          Institut Jean Nicod, Département d'études cognitives & Département de philosophie, ENS, EHESS, CNRS, PSL University, 75005, Paris, France
      su:
        Many-valued logic
        Algebraic logic
      sug:
        subj:
          Many-valued logic
          Algebraic logic
      keyword:
        Conditionals
        Connectives
        Deduction theorem
        Logical consequence
        Mixed consequence
        Sequent calculus
        Strict-Tolerant logic
        Substructural logic
        Truth value
        Truth-functionality
      ab: Given a consequence relation in many-valued logic, what connectives can be defined? For instance, does there always exist a conditional operator internalizing the consequence relation, and which form should it take? In this paper, we pose this question in a multi-premise multi-conclusion setting for the class of so-called intersective mixed consequence relations, which extends the class of Tarskian relations. Using computer-aided methods, we answer extensively for 3-valued and 4-valued logics, focusing not only on conditional operators, but also on what we call Gentzen-regular connectives (including negation, conjunction, and disjunction). For arbitrary N-valued logics, we state necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of such connectives in a multi-premise multi-conclusion setting. The results show that mixed consequence relations admit all classical connectives, and among them pure consequence relations are those that admit no other Gentzen-regular connectives. Conditionals can also be found for a broader class of intersective mixed consequence relations, but with the exclusion of order-theoretic consequence relations.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2021. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N