Reliability: an introduction.
Formal epistemology and the replication crisis There are two main formal models of source reliability and confirmation in the current literature on Bayesian epistemology Bovens and Hartmann ([2]); Olsson ([29]). Tolly draws on the notion of multi-type evidential reliabilism (MTE) and the standard to...
| Publicado en: | Synthese Vol. 198; no. 23; pp. 5615 - 5625 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Oct2021 Supplement 23
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=153415567&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 153415567 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00397857 4LI jtl: Synthese issn: 00397857 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct2021 Supplement 23 vid: 198 iid: 23 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 153415567 10.1007/s11229-020-02725-w ppf: 5615 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 245KB tig: atl: Reliability: an introduction. aug: au: Bonzio, Stefano Landes, Jürgen Osimani, Barbara affil: Department of Philosophy and Education Sciences, University of Turin, via Sant'Ottavio 20, 10124, Turin, Italy Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy, LMU Munich, Ludwigstr. 31, Room 129, 80539, Munich, Germany Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Marche Polytechnic University, 60126, Ancona, Italy su: Philosophy of science Scientific communication Philosophy of medicine Positron emission tomography sug: subj: Philosophy of science Scientific communication Philosophy of medicine Positron emission tomography ab: Formal epistemology and the replication crisis There are two main formal models of source reliability and confirmation in the current literature on Bayesian epistemology Bovens and Hartmann ([2]); Olsson ([29]). Tolly draws on the notion of multi-type evidential reliabilism (MTE) and the standard toolset of counterfactual semantics, in order to identify the truth conditions for a learning process to be defined as reliable: knowledge-enabling reliability requires a process token to be reliable with respect to multiple content-evidence pairs (i.e., the propositional content of the knowledge items, and the related evidential basis), each with varying degrees of specificity. Barbara Osimani is the PI of the European Research Council-founded project PhilPharm and gratefully acknowledges being fully funded by the project (Grant 639276). While we were working on this question using a formal epistemology approach Landes and Osimani ([24]); De Pretis et al. ([8]); Osimani and Landes ([32]); Osimani ([31]), we realised that the width of current active interests in the notion of reliability was much broader than we initially thought. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2021. All Rights Reserved. item: Synthese holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2021 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|