Grunt Vocalizations in Children With Disabilities: Relationships With Assessed Cognition and Language.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship of the grunt vocalizations to cognitive and expressive language status in children with disabilities. Children with typical development produce communicative grunts at the onset of referential word production and comprehension at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 64; no. 11; pp. 4138 - 4149
Autores principales: Bordenave, Diane, McCune, Lorraine
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Nov2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=153519493&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 153519493
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10924388
        1SM
      jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
      issn: 10924388
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2021
      vid: 64
      iid: 11
      pid: 42
      pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        153519493
        10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00202
      ppf: 4138
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 681KB
      tig:
        atl: Grunt Vocalizations in Children With Disabilities: Relationships With Assessed Cognition and Language.
      aug:
        au:
          Bordenave, Diane
          McCune, Lorraine
        affil:
          Southern University in New Orleans, LA
          Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick
      su:
        Children with disabilities
        Children's language
        Reliability (Personality trait)
        Human research subjects
        Cognition
        Interviewing
        Informed consent (Medical law)
        Language acquisition
        Psychological tests
        Communication
        Human voice
        Cognition in children
        Laryngeal physiology
        Statistics
        Speech evaluation
        Mann Whitney U Test
        Hypothesis
        Latent semantic analysis
        Descriptive statistics
      sug:
        subj:
          Children with disabilities
          Children's language
          Reliability (Personality trait)
          Human research subjects
          Cognition
          Interviewing
          Informed consent (Medical law)
          Language acquisition
          Psychological tests
          Communication
          Human voice
          Cognition in children
          Laryngeal physiology
          Statistics
          Speech evaluation
          Mann Whitney U Test
          Hypothesis
          Latent semantic analysis
          Descriptive statistics
      ab: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship of the grunt vocalizations to cognitive and expressive language status in children with disabilities. Children with typical development produce communicative grunts at the onset of referential word production and comprehension at 14-16 months of age and continue to use this vocalization for communication as they develop language. Method: All grunt vocalizations produced by 26 children with disabilities (mental age: 3-56 months; communicative age: 47-69 months) were identified from video-recorded seminaturalistic play sessions. Grunts were identified as accompanying effort or attention or as communicative bids. Participants were grouped as prelinguistic, emergent, language delay, and language competent based on standardized assessments of cognitive and language level. The Mann-Whitney U test (1947) compared groups to determine the relationships between grunt production and cognitive and language status. Results: As hypothesized, participants in the language delay group produced significantly more communicative grunts than those in the language competent group (W = 39, p = .028 < .05). The children with a cognitive and language level lower than 9 months (prelinguistic group) failed to produce communicative grunts. Conclusions: The results document grunt production in children with disabilities in the same contexts as typical children and support the hypothesized relationship between assessed cognition and language and communicative grunt production. These results require replication. This vocalization, if recognized in treatment, may unlock verbal communication in many nonverbal children with disabilities. Future longitudinal research should include controlled intervention to determine the potential effectiveness of building broader communicative skills on this simple vocalization.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N