The Contribution of Age, Working Memory Capacity, and Inhibitory Control on Speech Recognition in Noise in Young and Older Adult Listeners.
Purpose: The study aimed to investigate the relationship between speech recognition in noise, age, hearing ability, selfrated listening effort, inhibitory control (measured with the Swedish Hayling task), and working memory capacity (WMC; measured with the Reading Span test). Two different speech ma...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 64; no. 11; pp. 4513 - 4524 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Nov2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=153519514&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 153519514 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 10924388 1SM jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research issn: 10924388 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2021 vid: 64 iid: 11 pid: 42 pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association artinfo: ui: 153519514 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00251 ppf: 4513 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 874KB tig: atl: The Contribution of Age, Working Memory Capacity, and Inhibitory Control on Speech Recognition in Noise in Young and Older Adult Listeners. aug: au: Stenbäck, Victoria Marsja, Erik Hällgren, Mathias Lyxell, Björn Larsby, Birgitta affil: Linnaeus Centre HEAD, Linköping University, Sweden Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Sweden Department of Otorhinolaryngology in Östergötland, Linköping University, Sweden Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden Division of Technical Audiology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Sweden su: Older people Young adults Hearing Self-evaluation Executive function Semantics Task performance Age factors in speech Speech perception Short-term memory Response inhibition Noise Hearing disorders Descriptive statistics Research funding Statistical correlation sug: subj: Older people Young adults Hearing Self-evaluation Executive function Semantics Task performance Age factors in speech Speech perception Short-term memory Response inhibition Noise Hearing disorders Descriptive statistics Research funding Statistical correlation ab: Purpose: The study aimed to investigate the relationship between speech recognition in noise, age, hearing ability, selfrated listening effort, inhibitory control (measured with the Swedish Hayling task), and working memory capacity (WMC; measured with the Reading Span test). Two different speech materials were used: the Hagerman test with low semantic context and Hearing in Noise Test sentences with high semantic context, masked with either energetic or informational maskers. Method: A mixed design was used. Twenty-four young normally hearing (Mage = 25.6 years) and 24 older, for their age, normally hearing individuals (Mage = 60.6 years) participated in the study. Speech recognition in noise in both speech materials and self-rated effort in all four background maskers were correlated with inhibitory control and WMC. A linear mixed-effects model was set up to assess differences between the two different speech materials, the four different maskers used in the study, and if age and hearing ability affected performance in the speech materials or the various background noises. Results: Results showed that high WMC was related to lower scores of self-rated listening effort for informational maskers, as well as better performance in speech recognition in noise when informational maskers were used. The linear mixed-effects model revealed differences in performance between the low-context and the high-context speech materials, and the various maskers used. Lastly, inhibitory control had some impact on performance in the low-context speech material when masked with an informational masker. Conclusion: Different background noises, especially informational maskers, affect speech recognition and selfrated listening effort differently depending on age, hearing ability, and individual variation in WMC and inhibitory control. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|