Reward tampering problems and solutions in reinforcement learning: a causal influence diagram perspective.

Can humans get arbitrarily capable reinforcement learning (RL) agents to do their bidding? Or will sufficiently capable RL agents always find ways to bypass their intended objectives by shortcutting their reward signal? This question impacts how far RL can be scaled, and whether alternative paradigm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 198; no. 27; pp. 6435 - 6468
Autores principales: Everitt, Tom, Hutter, Marcus, Kumar, Ramana, Krakovna, Victoria
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Nov2021 Supplement 27
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Can humans get arbitrarily capable reinforcement learning (RL) agents to do their bidding? Or will sufficiently capable RL agents always find ways to bypass their intended objectives by shortcutting their reward signal? This question impacts how far RL can be scaled, and whether alternative paradigms must be developed in order to build safe artificial general intelligence. In this paper, we study when an RL agent has an instrumental goal to tamper with its reward process, and describe design principles that prevent instrumental goals for two different types of reward tampering (reward function tampering and RF-input tampering). Combined, the design principles can prevent reward tampering from being an instrumental goal. The analysis benefits from causal influence diagrams to provide intuitive yet precise formalizations.