Can Attacks against Embassies Serve as a Basis for the Invocation of Self-Defence? A Reply to Gábor Kajtár and Gergő Balázs.

In their article 'Beyond Tehran and Nairobi', Gábor Kajtár and Gergő Balázs examine whether attacks against embassies can qualify as 'armed attacks' and thus serve as a basis for the invocation of self-defence. Based on a survey of relevant state practice and opinio juris, and building on an impress...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Journal of International Law Vol. 32; no. 3; pp. 889 - 897
Autor principal: Ruys, Tom
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Aug2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=153797945&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 153797945
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09385428
        BHU
      jtl: European Journal of International Law
      issn: 09385428
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2021
      vid: 32
      iid: 3
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        153797945
        10.1093/ejil/chab062
      ppf: 889
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Can Attacks against Embassies Serve as a Basis for the Invocation of Self-Defence? A Reply to Gábor Kajtár and Gergő Balázs.
      aug:
        au: Ruys, Tom
        affil: Professor of international law, Ghent Rolin-Jaequemyns International Law Institute (GRILI), Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium
      su:
        International trade disputes
        Balance of trade
        Commercial treaties
        International trade dispute resolution
        Trade negotiation
      sug:
        subj:
          International trade disputes
          Balance of trade
          Commercial treaties
          International trade dispute resolution
          Trade negotiation
      ab: In their article 'Beyond Tehran and Nairobi', Gábor Kajtár and Gergő Balázs examine whether attacks against embassies can qualify as 'armed attacks' and thus serve as a basis for the invocation of self-defence. Based on a survey of relevant state practice and opinio juris, and building on an impressive database encompassing more than 730 incidents, the authors conclude that this question must, in all likelihood, be answered in the negative. This Reply raises the question whether the analysis and the material unearthed ultimately corroborate the conclusion which the authors distil therefrom. Upon closer scrutiny, it is suggested that there may be other, more compelling, inferences to be drawn from the material explored than the one hinted at by Kajtár and Balázs.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N