Orientalism in war and peace: the politics of academic scholarship during the long twentieth century.
In this paper I explore the relationship between Orientalism, empire-building and the development of the social sciences in the US during the long twentieth century. I focus on the construction of a series of academic infrastructures that the sponsors of the social sciences have underwritten to prod...
| Publicado en: | Third World Quarterly Vol. 42; no. 11; pp. 2521 - 2538 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Nov 2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=153878915&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 153878915 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01436597 TWQ jtl: Third World Quarterly issn: 01436597 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Nov 2021 vid: 42 iid: 11 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 153878915 10.1080/01436597.2021.1913405 ppf: 2521 ppct: 17 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T db: hlh ui: 153878915 – @attributes: type: P db: hlh ui: 153878915 tig: atl: Orientalism in war and peace: the politics of academic scholarship during the long twentieth century. aug: au: Nugent, David affil: Department of Anthropology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA su: War Peace Imperialism Scholarly method Social sciences Theory of knowledge Orientalism United States history sug: subj: War Peace Imperialism Scholarly method Social sciences Theory of knowledge Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities Orientalism United States history keyword: empire knowledge production social sciences US military empire knowledge production social sciences US military ab: In this paper I explore the relationship between Orientalism, empire-building and the development of the social sciences in the US during the long twentieth century. I focus on the construction of a series of academic infrastructures that the sponsors of the social sciences have underwritten to produce knowledge about the Others of empire. I am especially concerned with the role of these academic infrastructures in concealing imperial domination and in Orientalising imperial subjects. I trace the historical development of the infrastructures and explore the dilemmas they create for scholars who seek to critique processes in which they are unavoidably involved. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|