Behind the scenes of science in action: a 'replication in context' of a randomised control trial in Morocco.

This article is a 'replication in context' of a flagship randomised control trial (RCT) conducted in Morocco on microcredit. 'Replication in context' consists in combining the quantitative replication of an RCT with a contextualised analysis of its implementation and its political economy, in the se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Third World Quarterly Vol. 42; no. 11; pp. 2669 - 2690
Autores principales: Bédécarrats, Florent, Guérin, Isabelle, Morvant-Roux, Solène, Roubaud, François
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Nov 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=153878928&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 153878928
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01436597
        TWQ
      jtl: Third World Quarterly
      issn: 01436597
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov 2021
      vid: 42
      iid: 11
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        153878928
        10.1080/01436597.2021.1977114
      ppf: 2669
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
              db: hlh
              ui: 153878928
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              db: hlh
              ui: 153878928
      tig:
        atl: Behind the scenes of science in action: a 'replication in context' of a randomised control trial in Morocco.
      aug:
        au:
          Bédécarrats, Florent
          Guérin, Isabelle
          Morvant-Roux, Solène
          Roubaud, François
        affil:
          Nantes Metropolis, Nantes, France
          IRD-CESSMA (Centre for Social Science Studies on the African, American and Asian Worlds at the French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development), Université de Paris, Paris, France
          Graduate School of Social Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
          LEDa-DIAL (Joint Research Unit CNRS-IRD-Université Paris-Dauphine), Paris, France
      su:
        Morocco
        Randomized controlled trials
        Science & society
        Economics
        Replication (Experimental design)
        Microfinance
        Statistical sampling
        Acquisition of data
      sug:
        subj:
          Randomized controlled trials
          Science & society
          Economics
          Morocco
          Marketing Research and Public Opinion Polling
          Replication (Experimental design)
          Microfinance
          Statistical sampling
          Acquisition of data
      keyword:
        epistemology
        microfinance
        power
        Randomised control trials
        replication
        sociology of science
        epistemology
        microfinance
        power
        Randomised control trials
        replication
        sociology of science
      ab: This article is a 'replication in context' of a flagship randomised control trial (RCT) conducted in Morocco on microcredit. 'Replication in context' consists in combining the quantitative replication of an RCT with a contextualised analysis of its implementation and its political economy, in the sense of the interplay between different stakeholders with divergent and potentially conflicting interests, constraints and powers. 'Replication in context' draws on quantitative and qualitative data and uses the tools of statistics, political economy and sociology of science. This method allows us to describe the entire RCT production chain, from sampling, data collection, data entry and recoding, estimates and interpretations to publication and dissemination of the results. We find that this particular RCT does not respect the key principles of randomisation (imbalanced sampling and contamination) nor those of statistics (coding and measurement problems, poor-quality data and arbitrary trimming procedures). The qualitative analysis highlights the difficulties of implementing a randomised protocol in the real world. Beyond this particular case study, our analyses call into question the supposed superiority of randomised methods, echoing the growing unease in an academic field increasingly struggling to enforce the basic rules of ethics and scientific deontology.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N