Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Detection: Scoping Review.

Background: Skin cancer is the most common cancer type affecting humans. Traditional skin cancer diagnosis methods are costly, require a professional physician, and take time. Hence, to aid in diagnosing skin cancer, artificial intelligence (AI) tools are being used, including shallow and deep machi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Medical Internet Research Vol. 23; no. 11; pp. 1 - 18
Main Authors: Takiddin, Abdulrahman, Schneider, Jens, Yang, Yin, Abd-Alrazaq, Alaa, Househ, Mowafa
Format: research Journal Article
Published: JMIR Publications Inc. Nov2021
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=153881977&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 153881977
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14394456
        DNC
      jtl: Journal of Medical Internet Research
      issn: 14394456
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2021
      vid: 23
      iid: 11
      pid: 21567
      pub: JMIR Publications Inc.
      place: Toronto, Ontario
    artinfo:
      ui:
        153881977
        153881977
        NLM34821566
        153881977
        10.2196/22934
        NLM34821566
        153881977
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 17
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Artificial Intelligence for Skin Cancer Detection: Scoping Review.
      aug:
        au:
          Takiddin, Abdulrahman
          Schneider, Jens
          Yang, Yin
          Abd-Alrazaq, Alaa
          Househ, Mowafa
        affil: 1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
      sug:
        subj:
          Artificial Intelligence
          Skin Neoplasms Diagnosis
          Algorithms
          Human
          Reproducibility of Results
      ab: Background: Skin cancer is the most common cancer type affecting humans. Traditional skin cancer diagnosis methods are costly, require a professional physician, and take time. Hence, to aid in diagnosing skin cancer, artificial intelligence (AI) tools are being used, including shallow and deep machine learning-based methodologies that are trained to detect and classify skin cancer using computer algorithms and deep neural networks.Objective: The aim of this study was to identify and group the different types of AI-based technologies used to detect and classify skin cancer. The study also examined the reliability of the selected papers by studying the correlation between the data set size and the number of diagnostic classes with the performance metrics used to evaluate the models.Methods: We conducted a systematic search for papers using Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Xplore, Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library (ACM DL), and Ovid MEDLINE databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. The studies included in this scoping review had to fulfill several selection criteria: being specifically about skin cancer, detecting or classifying skin cancer, and using AI technologies. Study selection and data extraction were independently conducted by two reviewers. Extracted data were narratively synthesized, where studies were grouped based on the diagnostic AI techniques and their evaluation metrics.Results: We retrieved 906 papers from the 3 databases, of which 53 were eligible for this review. Shallow AI-based techniques were used in 14 studies, and deep AI-based techniques were used in 39 studies. The studies used up to 11 evaluation metrics to assess the proposed models, where 39 studies used accuracy as the primary evaluation metric. Overall, studies that used smaller data sets reported higher accuracy.Conclusions: This paper examined multiple AI-based skin cancer detection models. However, a direct comparison between methods was hindered by the varied use of different evaluation metrics and image types. Performance scores were affected by factors such as data set size, number of diagnostic classes, and techniques. Hence, the reliability of shallow and deep models with higher accuracy scores was questionable since they were trained and tested on relatively small data sets of a few diagnostic classes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N